The environmental destruction of Malta

November 19, 2019

Tuesday, 19th November 2019

The environmental destruction of Malta

Alfred E. Baldacchino

How to destroy a valley with EU funds.

The recent destruction at Wied Qirda by Infrastructure Malta is no surprise at all. Environment destruction has become synonymous with the agency in the ministry of Ian Borg.

This long wave of destruction is endless. Thousands of public trees (even the ministry has lost count of numbers) and the destruction of national biodiversity seem to be part of their interpretation of their mission statement, “to ensure [public   infrastructure] can sustainably and dynamically support the country’s current and future economic, environmental and social development”.

Concreting a valley bottom at Wied l-Isqof by Infrastructure Malta

Destruction of trees by Infrastructure Malta at Wied l-Isqof.

The covering with concrete/tarmac of valley paths at Wied l-Isqof, Rabat, Wied Ħesri, il-Lunzjata limits of Rabat, Imselliet, Wied is-Sewda, Wied Qirda and a number of valleys in Gozo, among others, means all have suffered extensive environmental damage.

Destroying old traditional rubble walls, replacing them with large franka stone blocks cladded with used building stones to give the impression that they are ħitan tax-xulliel is another contribution, while covering such new walls with concrete further renders them useless as an ecological habitat.

These can be seen at Buqana l/o Rabat, San Ġwann, Bir id-Deheb, Żejtun, everywhere where one can see a bulldozer paid for by the ministry with EU funds.

Such environmental destruction does not help any minister, especially one who is aspiring to climb the hierarchy in his political party.

Destruction of biodiversity at il-Lunzjata by Infrastructure Malta “in the name of farmers”.

Large franka blocks, cladded with used building stone, with a concrete top layer. Infrastructure Malta refer to these as ‘new rubble walls’.

Standard replies from Infrastructure Malta are nothing but puerile, devoid of any biodiversity protection and sustainability concepts. Who can believe IM today except those who are politically convinced that a circle is square? Even the Environment and Resources Authority (ERA) is not always consulted.

One cannot help but think that this is the dictatorial fashion in which IM are spending EU funds, ignoring any suggestions, criticism and appeals by stakeholders.

The Central Link Project is another case where stakeholders are going to court regarding the way decisions have been taken without adequate consultation.

It is only natural that one asks the European Union if it can stop such destruction of priceless biodiversity in our small island, which is being financed by their funds.

It would also be helpful if European Union representatives come to see the works being done and not only meet officials behind closed doors but also meet the stakeholders, who are  ignored and not consulted.

Those who feel responsible for the country and its natural environment cannot stand by and stare at such destruction

Butchered trees at Santa Lucia where a journalist was threatened – 04.08.2019. 

The usual lame excuse by the ministry, that such destruction in valleys and country paths is to accommodate farmers, is indeed hilarious. To the extent that such valley roads are being tarmacked in lieu of potholed secondary streets in towns and villages, unless of course IM believes that there are no such roads to address.

The desperate position of Infrastructure Malta reached culmination point when it stated Wied Qirda was being tarmacked in an area which has for the last two years been earmarked for expropriation.

Works by Infrastructure Malta at Wied l-Isqof concreting valley paths and dislodging rubble walls “in the interest of farmers”.

Are we expected to applaud such ‘good governance’: tarmacking a private valley path which has as yet to be expropriated?

The news that the ministry of Ian Borg will also take over Ta’ Qali to transform it into a national park makes many hold their breath.

The mentality, lack of vision on biodiversity and approach of destroying the natural environment by this ministry’s agency cannot but lead to another environmental disaster, funded by the EU.

About 8 indigenous Holm Oak trees eradicated from Balzan valley, near Lija Cemetery, to widen the road. Works done by Infrastructure Malta.

The importation of trees grown in different habitats overseas, even if they are indigenous, to be planted as new trees or to replace mature ones would only please the chosen ‘landscaper’ or his representative.

For the record, “The Ministry for Transport and Infrastructure had appealed a tribunal’s (The Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal) decision and filed a court case (45/2017) against the Commissioner for Information and Data Protection, before the first hall of the Civil Court” for ordering the ministry to make available the public contract between government and ELC. Another official stand by this ministry against freedom of information on environmental matters.

One would be justified to ask what minister Borg is trying to achieve?

With his Infrastructure Malta at the helm of such destructive projects, he stands to lose not only his environmental credibility, if there is anything left to lose, but also his approach at handling, implementing and ensuring “sustainably and dynamically support the ongoing optimisation of the road network”.

Work is being executed by unprofessional personnel, who cannot see any light towards the need of the professional use, management and protection of biodiversity in a sustainable way, but blindfoldedly bulldoze over all stakeholders.

Those who feel responsible for the country and its natural environment, which has been loaned to us by future generations, cannot stand by and stare at such destruction.

Not everybody has a square-circled mentality in this country, and there are many conscientious people too in the party to which Minister Borg belongs.

Who would have thought that an old friend of mine with whom environmental matters were discussed would today be opposing such noble environmental principles?

It is important that future generations will know who was at the helm of such environmental destruction with the help of EU funds. Funds which could have been better used in a sustainable way for the benefit of society and the environment.

The legacy of environmental devastation, left by Infrastructure Malta, is there for one and all to see. Wied Qirda is another such legacy in their long list.

aebaldacchino@gmail.com

related articles:

https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/the-architect-the-judge-the-house-and-the-illegal-driveway.686056

https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/workers-at-wied-qirda-ignore-regulators-orders-to-stop.750328

Fake rubble walls ‘are illegal’

Environment Landscaping Conundrum

Environment hit by EU funds

“For our trees”

More biodiversity destruction with EU funds – confirmed

EU funds destroy Maltese biodiversity

‘Destroying trees to make way for cars is a big mistake’

 


Credit where credit is due

April 18, 2019

Alfred E Baldacchino

Thursday, 18 April 2019

Following concerns expressed by members of the public, eNGOs, and individuals, on the destruction of biodiversity in country paths which were being widened and covered with concrete, Environment Resources Authority (ERA) ordered Infrastructure Malta to halt the works, and issued a stop and compliance order. Furthermore, according to press reporting, ERA ordered Infrastructure Malta to reinstate the country paths to their original state.

One hopes that all country paths mismanaged by Infrastructure Malta will be reinstated to their original state. One also hopes that this is the end of an era where biodiversity is regarded as ‘ħaxix ħażin’ (good-for-nothing-vegetation) and that such mentality will be put to rest.

One cannot but applaud the stand ERA has taken and look out to more similar decisions in the near future to protect biodiversity.

The following is one of the article which appeared in the media.

Wednesday, April 17, 2019

Rabat country roads being reinstated after controversial widening

Recent concrete works encroached adjacent land

Keith Micallef

 

Country roads at Wied l-Isqof in Rabat are being reinstated to their original state. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

Country roads at Wied l-Isqof in Rabat are being reinstated to their original state. Photo: Chris Sant Fournier

Some of the concrete controversially laid on country roads in a Rabat valley is being pulled up again by Infrastructure Malta on orders from the environment watchdog, which wants the roads to be reinstated to their original footprint.

The controversy erupted last month when it transpired that a number of narrow country roads used primarily by farmers at Wied l-Isqof were being widened, as part of a government project to “reconstruct” rural roads.

Faced by this outrage, the Environment Resources Authority ordered Infrastructure Malta to halt the works, through what it called a stop and compliance order. The measure was taken because the project was resulting in “biodiversity destruction”, ERA had said.

Infrastructure Malta argued that the roads in question were not being widened beyond their original footprint – even though evidence on the ground suggested otherwise.

However, an ERA spokeswoman confirmed that Infrastructure Malta had, in fact, encroached on adjacent land. She said that concreting beyond the original footprint was being removed by the roads agency’s contractors through the use of appropriate heavy machinery.

Several truckloads of material have been removed and dispatched for appropriate disposal to enable the area’s habitat to regenerate even in the area previously concreted, she said.

An onsite visit confirmed that the roads had been narrowed, with a stretch of soil replacing the concrete along the perimeter.

In its reply, ERA said it had intervened because the roadworks were degrading the ecosystem of the area beyond the asphalted area.

Among other things, the interventions had altered the physical profile of the valley and the natural course of the freshwater stream to the detriment of the biodiversity and the natural characteristics of the site, the spokeswoman said.

Environmentalists had denounced the works, saying vegetation was being obliterated as concrete was being poured beyond the existing footprint, damaging flora and fauna on both sides of the road.

Biodiversity expert and former assistant director of the environment protection directorate at the now defunct Malta environment and planning authority, Alfred Baldacchino, had warned that turning these roads into “highways” could have a detrimental effect on farmers due to the increase in traffic.

He also criticised the project, saying the concrete was blocking the percolation of rainwater to the water table.

aebaldacchino@gmail.com 

related articles:

More biodiversity destruction with EU funds – confirmed

EU funds destroy Maltese biodiversity

 

 

 


Let’s help the birds breed

April 2, 2015

times of malta

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Let’s help the birds breed

Alfred E. Baldacchino

I was introduced to birds before I could even speak. As a toddler, I used to frequent our house garden, observing the hens, rabbits and pigeons we kept for the occasional special lunch. But there was a rule for harvesting: the selected food for the table was not chosen haphazardly.

The brooding hens, nesting pigeons and rabbits with litters were spared and when they were harvested, they were not let loose and chased for the thrill of the kill.

juvenile-turtle-doves-in-malta---2012.07.01---Natalino-Fenech

If the parents did not escape the greed for the kill in spring, these juveniles would not have seen the light of day. Photo: Natalino Fenech 2012.07.01

Coming from Rabat, it was, at the time, almost impossible not to join relatives on trapping and shooting sprees, even at a tender age. I can still remember cycling, two hours before sunrise, to Dingli or Raba’ Nemel, to lay the nets for trapping finches or turtle doves. That was the way we were taught then. I also learnt to appreciate nature without the need to destroy it.

At the age of 12, we went to live in Cospicua. At first I thought I had lost the birds and the wildlife forever, though they were only a couple of kilometres away. My love for nature made me look for alternative ways. I used to go out for country walks on weekends and holidays, and I remember, in my early teens, buying magazines about nature. This opened the way for positive appreciation. I also bought a sophisticated ‘gun’, aiming at and shooting to my heart’s content, without the birds or other wildlife being harmed or even knowing about it. It was my first SLR camera.

quail-in-Malta-by-Natalino-Fenech

Quail – another breeding bird of the Maltese Islands, despite the urge to kill it. Photo: Natalino Fenech

Living in Cospicua, I experienced that sense of loss and anguish when birds were decimated and killed just for the fun of it, more so when this was claimed to be out of a love for birds.

The more I grew in years, knowledge and experience, the more satisfaction and pleasure did wildlife bring to me. The road was not an easy one: it was full of ups and downs. I often remind myself one is not paid to uphold one’s principles but one has to pay for them.

But I was determined to continue sharing my experience and knowledge with those who, though they really loved birds, unfortunately were never taught to express their appreciation in a positive way. Indeed, they were prevented from doing so because their love for birds was used or abused for political gain in exchange for their vote, irrespective of the negative psychological impact it had on them.

They formed part of a ‘minority’ that, instead of being encouraged to give their share, considering their knowledge, eagerness and enthusiasm, were abused for political gain.

What a wonderful place it would be if all those who love birds would work together to safeguard them so they could be positively appreciated and enjoyed by one and all, even by the shooters, for the benefit of the birds, the ecosystem and the country as a whole.

turtle-dove

How can one say that one loves birds and to show one’s appreciation one shoots to kill the bird one says one loves.

 

That is why I shall be voting No, to stop the hunting of birds during their breeding season. During their delicate time of reproduction, birds deserve the utmost care and protection. This is the basic concept of any true conservationist.

Voting No to spring shooting when the birds are on their way to breed will make us proud to be Maltese, at par with the best in the European Union. And only this will make birds and nature lovers unite.

I trust common sense will prevail.

aebaldacchino@gmail.com


Ir-Rabat, ir-Rabtin u l-Kunsill Lokali

October 7, 2014

NewsBook

Ir-Rabat, ir-Rabtin u l-Kunsill Lokali

it-Tlieta, 7 ta’ Ottubru, 2014

Alfred E. Baldacchino

Dawn l-aħħar ġimgħat ir-Rabtin kienu mħassba u xi ftit inkwetati minħabba proġett li qed isir bil-għajnuna ta’ fondi mill-Unjoni Ewropea li l-Kunsill Lokali tar-Rabat ġab għall-proġett li fassal għat-triq Santa Rita fejn kull nhar ta’ Ħadd kien jarma l-monti.

Mhux minħabba l-proġett innifsu, għaliex kulħadd huwa favur li jara li dan isir. Imma minħabba l-mod kif dan ġie u qiegħed jiġi amministrat mingħajr mar-Rabtin għandhom it-tagħrif li jixtiequ jkunu jafu, u kif huma ma humiex parti minn dawn id-deċiżjonijiet meħuda. Uħud minnhom isiru jafu bihom meta dawn jitħabbru.

l-ewwel intopp faqqa’ fuq is-sit eletroniku Rabti People who like or live in Rabat Malta meta tħabbar li sakemm jitlesta’ x-xogħol, il-monti kellu jmur fi triq it-tiġrija taħt is-Saqqajja fejn fl-Imnarja jtellqu l-ħmir u ż-żwiemel.

Dan kellu impatt fuq ir-Rabtin, ix-xerrejja li kienu jżuru l-monti nhar ta’ Ħadd u anki fuq il-bejjiegħa nfushom. U dan wassal għal numru ta’ kummenti, suġġerimenti pożittivi, u kritika kostruttiva li dehret  fuq is-sit eletroniku Rabti.

Imma mhux talli dawn ma ġewx mismugħa mill-Kunsill Lokali, imma lanqas biss ingħata kas tagħhom. Uħud ukoll qalu li xi deċiżżjonijiet tal-kunsill xi kultant jidhru li ttieħdu wara bibien magħluqa jew mingħajr konsultazzjoni wiesgħa biżżejjed.

Wara li sit eletroniku Rabti far b’dawn il-kummenti, bdew ħerġin xi kummenti minn xi membri tal-Kunsill. Mhux ċar jekk dawn kienux qed jitkellmu għan-nom tal-Kunsill jew kienux personali biex forsi jttaffu l-weġgħat ta’ dawk ir-Rabtin li tellgħu lil dawn il-membri li jirrapreżentaw  il-partiti l-kbar, fuq il-kunsill.

siġar-qabel-ma-nqalgħu

Ritratti meħuda mis-sit eletroniku Rabti: siġar qabel ma nqalgħu.

Il-kobba kompliet titħabbel meta beda x-xogħol. Numru ta’ siġar tal-wirdien, jew difla jew kif jafuhom xi wħud, siġar tal-oleandru, ġew maqlugħa minkejja li mhux kollha jidhru fil-permess tal-MEPA. Siġra oħra mħarsa bil-liġi ġiet maqlugħa u skont kif kiteb membru tal-Kunsill fuq is-sit eletroniku, ġiet imħawla d-Dwejra. Siġar oħra fuq il-post, li jissemmew fil-peremess tal-MEPA huma siġar tal-wirdien, awrikarja, ballut, tin u żebbuġ. Dawn kellhom jiġu mħawla fi Triq Santa Rita fil-postijiet indikati. Uħud minn dawn imħarsa bil-ligi jidhru li huma lesti għal qlugħ.  Mhux talli hekk talli l-permess tal-MEPA, bid-data tas-27 ta’ Ottubru 2010,  jidher ċar li dawk is-siġar li kellhom jinqalgħu riedu jithawlu fuq il-post mill-ġdid u mhux id-Dwejra. Permess tal-MEPA aktar qarib ma jitkellem xejn fuq qlugħ ta’ siġar.

siġar-maqlugħa-minn-triq-Santa-Rita-Rabat

Ritratti meħuda mis-sit eletroniku Rabti: siġar li għebu għalkollox.

U hawn wara li l-Kunsill Lokali naqas bil-kbir li jagħti tagħrif lil dawk ir-Rabtin li tellgħuh u oħrajn, u naqas ukoll li jilqa’ l-ilmeti tagħhom, wieħed ma jistax ma jagħmelx xi mistoqsijiet:

  1. Għaliex il-MEPA, wara dawn l-ilmenti kollha pubbliċi li saru u għadhom qed isiru mir-Rabtin dwar dan ix-xogħol, tibqa’ siekta u ma tiħux passi biex tara li x-xogħol isir skont il-kondizzjonijiet li għamlet?
  2. Għaliex is-Segretarju Parlamentari responsabbli mill-Kunsilli Lokali ma għamel l-ebda kumment, pubbliku jew le, fuq il-mod kif il-Kunsill Lokali tar-Rabat mhux qed jagħti kas tal-ilmenti Rabtin u mhux qed jitkellem magħhom b’mod uffiċjali dwar dan ix-xogħol u l-permessi li għandu?
  3. Għaliex il-wegħda 56 fil-programm elettorali tal-Gvern, li tgħid “Inħarsu kontinwament is-sigar eżistenti fl-ibliet u l-irħula Maltin u ninċentivaw it-tħawwil ta’ aktar siġar, partikolarment dawk indigeni” qed tiġi mwarrba, aktar u aktar meta l-Kunsill tar-Rabat huwa fil-maggoranza tiegħu mill-partit fil-gvern?
il-futur-imċajpar-ta'-siġar

Siġra oħra fi Triq Santa Rita, ir-Rabat, li l-futur tagħhom huwa mċajpar.

Dawn il-problemi setgħu ma nqagħlu xejn . U mhux xi ħaġa diffiċli biex wieħed jitkellem ma’ dawk kollha li għandhom interess fir-Rabat. Possibbli li f’dan il-pajjiż meta wieħed jikseb il-poter ma jara xejn ħażin meta ma jismax u jwarrab kompletament lil dawk li poġġewh hemm?

aebaldacchino@gmail.com

 

 

 


TKOMPLI L-QERDA FIL-ĠNIEN HOWARD… imma għaliex?

June 9, 2014

NewsBook

It-Tnejn, 9 ta’ Ġunju, 2014

TKOMPLI L­-QERDA FIL-ĠNIEN HOWARD… imma għaliex?

Alfred E. Baldachino

Kull darba li nitla’ nittawwal il-Ġnien Howard, dejjem niltaqa’ ma xi impatt negattiv ġdid. Xi kultant inħoss li f’dan il-pajjiż hawn xi direttiva jew xi politika uffiċjali biex l-ambjent naturali jew il-biodiversità ta’ pajjiżna tinqered, u minn jeqridha jitħallas minn flus pubbliċi.

Fit-2 ta’ Marzu 2014, tpoġġa ritratt fuq sit Rabti li wera ammont ta’ żrar li tferrex taħt is-siġar taż-żnuber fil-Ġnien Howard, ir-Rabat. Wara li tliet Rabtin marru l-uffiċċju tal-Prim Ministru, il-MEPA waqqfet dan ix-xogħol. Il-Kunsill Lokali (tal-Imdina) ġie ordnat li fi żmien xahar ineħħi dan iż-żrar li sar mingħajr permess. Il-K.L. Mdina appella minn din id-deċiżjoni. Issa għaddew tliet xhur u kollox għadu kif kien. Dan wassal biex inbdiet talba biex dan jitneħħa: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/665/188/518/?taf_id=11173325&cid=fb_na

Il-MEPA għadha qed tistudju, taħsibha, tixtarr, twieżen din il-problema u għadha ma ħadet l-ebda passi. Nafu li l-MEPA tħalli deċiżjonijiet bħal dawn minn ġurnata għal oħra sakemm forsi ssib kif taħsel idejha u ma tieħu l-ebda deċiżjoni, bħalma ġara fil-­każ taċ-ċimiterju f’Wied il-Qasab fin-Nadur Għawdex. Wieħed ma jistax ma jgħidx li l-MEPA ssibha bi tqila biex turi  interess fil-ħarsien tal-ambjent, qasam fejn falliet bil-kbir, saħansitra anki fi kwistjonijiet żgħar.

Il-kisi ta' parti mill-Ġnien Howard biż-żrar

Il-kisi ta’ parti mill-Ġnien Howard biż-żrar

Fl-aħħar mawra tiegħi r-Rabat, bħas-soltu mxejt matul il-ġnien; bdejt mill-ġnien tas-Salib, dak iż-żgħir, u pass pass wasalt sa fuq it-Tomba, li għal dawk li ma humiex midħla tal-Ġnien Rabti, hija l-aktar parti ’l ġewwa li tħares lejn l-Imtarfa, fuq l-istazzjon tal-ferrovija l-antik.

Fil-ġnien is-siġar tal-palm, dawk tal-kanizzati u dawk tat-tamal, kollha kienu meqruda mill-bumunqar aħmar tal-palm. Baqa’ biss il-fdal taz-zokk tagħhom: momument għal dik il-politika li minkejja li kellha l-parir biex ma jiġux impurtati siġar mill-Eġittu u minn Sqallija, xorta tat il-barka biex dawn jidħlu Malta. Baqa’ waħda biss, fil-kantuniera tat-Tomba tħares lejn il-Domus Romana u konvint li meta nerġa nitla’ r-Rabat, tkun għebet mal-oħrajn.

L-aħħar siġra tal-palm li baqa' fil-Ġnien Howard. L-oħrajn kollha mietu u nqatgħu

L-aħħar siġra tal-palm li baqa’ fil-Ġnien Howard. L-oħrajn kollha mietu u nqatgħu

 Dort dawra mejt mat-Tomba fejn matul dawn l-aħħar ġranet fix-xfar tal-wesgħa kien ikun hemm numru ta’ fjuri slavaġġ, fosthom is-suffejra ta’ Malta, endemika għall-gżejjer Maltin (ara ritratt). Il-biċċa l-kbira tagħhom għebu, mqaxxrin, u ma niskantax jekk kienu anki mbexxin bil-kimika velenuża biex ma jerġgħux jitilgħu aktar. Lanqas naħla ma tista’ tirgħa u ddakkar il-fjuri slavaġġ, minkejja li din ittina’ l-għasel u ddakkar il-frott. U dan fi ġnien.

Suffejra tar-raba' li kienet tikber madwar it-tomba.

Suffejra ta’ Malta li kienet tikber madwar it-Tomba.

Jiena u ħiereġ lura mit-­Tomba għan-naħa tad-Domus Romana, inħsadt. Ftit ġimgħat ilu kien hemm numru ta’ pjanti slavaġġ bħal ngħidu aħna ġarġir abjad, ħarira ħamra, fjurdulis, u oħrajn li kollha, mingħajr ħlas, kienu jlibbsu l-inħawi bil-kuluri u jwieżnu insetti dakkara, fosthom in-naħal. Dawn għebu għax kollha ġew maħruta u ma kien baqa’ xejn minnhom. Imħallas mill-K.L. Mdina, bi flus pubbliċi, ma għadniex xi ngħidu. Imma l-isbaħ, u li vera turi l-mentalità miskina ta’ dan il-pajjiż, wara li qerdu kull fjura u werqa Maltija li kienet qed tikber f’dawn il-mixtliet, x’taħsbu li ħallew? Penisetum (Fountain Grass), pjanta invażiva li qed tintuża mill-kuntrattur tal-Gvern fit-toroq u li sabet ruħha fil-Ġnien Howard; minkejja li din hija invażiva u qed tinfirex madwar il-gżejjer Maltin kemm fit-toroq, kif ukoll fl-ambjent naturali. Din tħalliet hemm!

Ġarġir Abjad kien isebbaħ il-=mixtliet fil-ġnien. Inqered kollu.

Ġarġir Abjad kien isebbaħ il-mixtliet fil-ġnien. Inqered kollu.

U hawnhekk sfortunatament niddejjaq ngħid li dan il-pajjiz milli jidher ma jista’ jinfeda qatt. Il-valur li jingħata lill-biodiversità huwa valur ta’ flus biss. Jekk wieħed jixtri pjanta jew siġra, dan itiha valur. Imma jekk pjanta tikber waħeda, allura din ma għandiex valur u tista’ tinqered, u titbexx bil-kimika valenuża biex ma terġax titla’. U mhux talli hekk, talli din il-qerda għandha l-approvazzjoni uffiċjali u tithallas minn flus il-poplu.

 

2012.12.28---it-Tomba---karozzi,-siġar-imutu,-u-penisetum
It-Tomba, fil-Ġnien Ħoward, taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-K.L. tal-Imdina
– Karozzi, siġar tal-palm qed imutu jew mietu. u pjanti invażivi tal-Penisetum.

 L-akbar xokk ta’ din il-metalità miskina ta’ dan il-pajjiż kien in-numru ta’ karozzi li bdew deħlin biex jistrieħu fuq it-Tomba. Tista’ timmaġina karozzi fi ġnien? Qaluli li kien hemm tieġ l-Imdina u hekk il-K.L.Mdina jħalli is-serħan tal-karozzi fil-Ġnien Howard. Jista’ wieħed jimmagina kieku l-K.L. Mdina jħalli karozzi fil-foss fil-passaġġi fejn sar ġnien għall-familja? Jew iħalli l-karozzi kollha tat-tieġ jidħlu l-Imdina u jitħallew quddiem il-Katidral? Jew aħjar jitqiegħdu fuq iz-zuntier tal-Katidral? U aktar u aktar jiddaħħlu ġewwa l-Katidral? Ara kieku kif ir-residenti tal­-Imdina u l-Maltin iqumu għal minn ikun ta dan il-permess. Mhux talli hekk talli l­-ebda karozza ma tista’ tidħol ġol­-Imdina, ħlief dawk tar-­residenti. Imma li l-karozzi jitqiegħdu ġo ġnien fir-Rabat, jidher li kollox sew għall-K.L. Mdina!

2014.05.23 - Calendula-suffruticosa-subsp.-fulgida3

L-anqas naħla ma tista’ ddakkar fjura u tagħmel l-għasel

Li jinkwetani huwa li milli jidher ma hemm l-ebda entità politika li hija responsabbli biex twaqqaf dawn l-oxxenitajiet. Suppost li hemm Ministeri li huma responsabbli mit-trasport; mill-ġonna; mill-Kunsilli Lokali, u anki mill-MEPA. Din tal-aħħar issa ħaditha drawwa li meta jkun hemm il-qerda tal-ambjenbt tħares in-naħa l-oħra sakemm xi ħadd minn fuqha jiġbdilha l­attenzjoni. Ara ż-żrar issa għadu hemm tliet xhur minkejja l-protesti tan-nies u nuqqas ta’ permessi. U la ma hemm l-ebda azzjoni ministerjali, allura wieħed jista’ jgħid li dawn għandhom il-barka ta’ min imexxi. Kont anki naħseb li r-Rabat hemm kunsill lokali wkoll, imma mid-dehra sejjer żball. Wara kollox kappell ma jmejjilx lill-ieħor.

Mill-esperjenza li għandi u mill-kuntatti li għandi mal-Kunsilli Lokali ma nsibhiex diffiċli biex ngħid li l-Kunsill tal-Imdina ma jħabbatha miegħu ħadd fuq in-nuqqas ta’ apprezzament tal-ambjent: il-foss tal-Imdina, il-Ġnien Howard, u issa smajt l-għajdut li qed ikun hemm xi ħsibijiet biex jinqalgħu dawk is-siġar ta’ taħt it-Tomba li jwasslu sa Għajn Ħamam biex din il-wesgħa tintuża għall-karozzi. Wieħed għad irid jara x’se jiġri imma, għalkemm jekk din tasal sa għand il­MEPA wieħed jista’ jgħid mill-ewwel x’se jiġri.

Il-fdalijiet tas-iġra tal-palm fil-ġnien Howard, ir-Rabat. Pedestal lest għal minn daħħal il-bumunqar aħmar f'dawn il-gżejjer.

Il-fdalijiet tas-siġar tal-palm fil-ġnien Howard, ir-Rabat. Pedestal lest għal minn daħħal il-bumunqar aħmar f’dawn il-gżejjer.

Kif jgħidu mhux il-flus u l-poter jagħmluk matur u konxju għall-weġgħat tas-soċjetà u tal-ambjent. Anzi ħafna drabi huma dawn li jwasslu għal dawn il-weġgħat, aktar u aktar meta wieħed isib ruħu jgħum fihom.

aebaldacchino@gmail.com

alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com

 

 


IR-RABJA TAR­-RABTIN… u bir-­raġun

March 10, 2014

 NewsBook

It-Tnejn, 10 ta’ Marzu, 23014

IR­-RABTIN IRRABJATI… u bir-­raġun

Alfred E. Baldacchino

Howard-Gardens

Ritratt: Joseph Sultana

Wieħed mill­-karatteristiċi tar-­Rabat huwa l­-ġnien Howard li hemm qabel ma tidħol l-Imdina. Dan il­-ġnien, kontra kif jaħsbu xi wħud, huwa msemmi għal Malti John Howard, li twieled il-­Belt fl­-1862. Kien Prim Ministru ta’ Malta bejn 1921 u 1923.

Joseph-howard-prime-minister

Joseph Howard
(1862 – 1925)

Il-­ġnien huwa maqsum fi tnejn: dak il­-kbir u dak iż­-żgħir jew kif jafuh xi wħud, il­-ġnien tas-­salib. Dawk li huma tal­-età tiegħi u huma mir­-Rabat, jiftakru ż-żgħożija tagħhom f’dan il-­ġnien mal­-ġenituri tagħhom jilgħabu b’xi ballun, jew bir­-rota jduru man­-numru ta’ ħammiela li madwarhom il-­ġnien huwa mfassal. Dawk akbar fl-età kont tarahom jippassiġġaw matul il­-mgħodija ewlenija li tħares għal fuq il-foss tal-Imdina. Ħafna b’għajnejhom mixgħulin iħarsu lejn xi ġuvni jew xi tfajla biex jisirqu xi tbissima jew jiġbdu xi ħarsa. Kienu ġranet sbieħ, b’dawk fuq l-għoxrin li jkun irnexxilhom jagħmlu ħbieb, fuq xi bank taħt xi siġra jitkellmu fil-widnejn, kif dawk żgħar kienu jaħsbu. Żmien ta’ innoċenza u żmien sabiħ li llum tar mar-­riħ.

Għalkemm issa ili nieqes mir-­Rabat aktar minn ħamsin sena, xorta nagħmel żjara lil dan il-­ġnien kull meta nista’ biex niftakar f’dawk il­­-ġranet sbieħ ta’ żgħożiti. Imma kull darba li nmur hemm nitlaq lura bi qsim il-­qalb. Spiċċaw dawk il­-ħammiliet kollha fjuri msoqqija u mnaqqija bi mħabba u b’għira. Spiċċaw dawk il-ħwat mimlijin ilma bil-­­ħut fihom. Saħansitra anki għebu dawk is-­siġar tal-palm xjuħ li nqerdu mill­-Bumunqar Aħmar tal­-Palm, wara deċiżjonijiet politiċi żbaljati li wittew it-­triq biex dan fl-­2007 daħal fil­-gżejjer Maltin.

Il-fdalijiet-ta'-siġra-tal-palm (A E Baldacchino)


Waħda mill-ħafna fdalijiet ta’ siġar tal-palm li llum wieħed jista’ jara fil-ġnien Howard (A E Baldacchino)

Bħallikieku dan mhux biżżejjed dan l-­aħħar dan il­-ġnien waqa’ vittma ta’ deċiżjonijiet, ma nistax ma nsejħilhomx stupidi, mingħajr ebda viżjoni ta’ tfassil u mmanniġar professjonali. Fit-­2 ta’ Marzu, ħarget  l-aħbar fuq il-blog Rabti https://www.facebook.com/groups/rabatmalta/   fejn r-Rabti Joseph Sultana,  poġġa ritratt ta’ kif dan il-­ġnien ġie mżeblaħ u abbużat. U r­Rabtin qamu f’daqqa u għajtu b’għajta f’rabja Rabtija, li ma ridux minn ikasbarhom u ma ridux min jgħaddi ż­-żmien bihom.

Żrar-fil-ġnien


Żrar li ntefa’ fuq il-ħamrija minflok l-imlieqa biex il-Kunsill tal-Imdina jsebbaħ l-art (Ritratt: Joseph Sultana)

Ħaġa li la jiena u lanqas numru ta’ Rabtin oħra ma jistgħu jifhmu hija kif dan il­-ġnien huwa taħt ir­-responsabbiltà tal-­Kunsill Lokali tal-Imdina, meta dan huwa barra mis­-swar. U ħaga oħra li tweġġa ħafna lil Rabtin hija kif dan il­-Kunsill tal-Imdina, minn wara s­-swar jidher li huwa maqtugħ mill­-ħajja f’dawn l­-inħawi tar­-Rabat, qabad u ddeċieda, wara li ftiehem kif qal is­-segretarju eżekuttiv tal­-Kunsill, ma’ studenti minn Istitut tal-­agrikoltura Franċiż. Dawn iddeċiedew li jaqalgħu parti mill-imlieqa (jiġifieri l-­hedges) li jdawru l­-ġnien u li l­-Kunsill qal li huma ħajt, jgħattu l­-ħamrija bil­-plastik, jiksu dan il-­plastik biż­-żrar, u jħawwlu kaktus u sukkulenti oħra, li skont il­-kelliemi tal­-Kunsill Lokali tal­-Imdina, huma pjanti indiġeni, jiġifieri pjanti Maltin. Minn fejn ġab dan it-­tagħrif xjentifiku żbaljat il-kelliem għall­-Kunsill Lokali tal­-Imdina ma nafx. U ma naħsebx li ġabu minn Franza lanqas, għaliex kieku dawn kienu jifhmu fil­-biodiversità u mhux ċwieċ kif-intqal, kienu

kaktus-indiġenu-kif-intqal

Skont il-pariri li ngħata l-Kunsill Lokali tal-Imdina, dawn il-kaktus huma kollha speci indiġeni Maltin
(Ritratti: Joseph Sultana)

jgħidulu li dawn mhumiex pjanti Maltin. U kif il-­kelliem għall­-Kunsill Lokali tal­-­Imdina qal ukoll, hemm il­-ħsieb li dan jitkompla s-­sena d-dieħla biex il­­ġnien iż­-żgħir jiddawwar b’dan iż-­żrar, bil­-għajununa tal­-konsulenza barranija, bi flus Maltin, u bi pjanti barranin, u mingħajr bdil ta’ fehmiet mar-Rabtin.

Lili weġġgħani l­-kliem tar-­rapreżentant tal-­Kunsill tal-­Imdina fejn ġie allegat li qal li min ma jifhimx aħjar ma jitkellimx, għax dan ix­-xogħol mhux isir minn xi ċuċ. Imma min qal li l-­kaktus imħawwel huwa indiġenu, dan jifhem ħafna u ara wieħed ma jaħsebx li huwa xi ċuċ.

Li jweġġa’ lir­-Rabtin f’din l-­affari kollha huwa li l-­Kunsill tal-­Imdina ma kellux il-ħeġġa u l-għaqal biex jitkellem ma’ dawk li għandhom interess f’dan il­-ġnien skedat u jara x’jaħsbu, kemm b’mod ġenerali l-Maltin, kif ukoll aktar u aktar ir-­Rabtin li jqisu li dan il-­ġnien huwa tagħhom. Imma saru diskuzzjonijiet, ftehim u finanzjar ta’ dan il-progett ma’ studenti barranin, mingħajr ma ġew diskussi ma’ ħadd.

Aktar u aktar is-­skiet tal­-Kunsill tar-­Rabat, li meta ra u sema’ bir­-rabja tar-­Rabtin, li wara kollox kienu huma li poġġewhom hemm, huma ta’ liema partit huma, biex iħarsu l-­interessi tar-­Rabat, baqgħu friski bħal ħassa. Ma fethux ħalqhom, sallum għall-­anqas. U mid­-dehra l­-Kunsill tal-­Imdina u l-­Kunsill tar­-Rabat jimxu id f’id għaliex dak tal­-Imdina baqa’ sieket, wisq probabli b’idejn waħda fuq għajnejh u fuq widnejh u bl-­oħra fuq ħalqu, u ma tniffsux fuq l­-istragi li saret fil-­foss tal-­Imdina, minkejja l­-protesti tar­-Rabtin. U anki dak tar­-Rabat baqa’ sieket mhux biss fil­-proġett tal-­foss tal-Imdina, imma anki meta s­-siġar ta’ fuq is-Saqqajja ġabhuhom aktar jixbhu arbli tad-­dawl milli siġar. Issa wkoll qisu ma qed jiġri xejn minkejja r­-rabja Rabtija. Kunsilli Lokali bħal dawn ma naħsebx li jistgħu jkunu kburin bil­kisbiet tagħhom, aktar u aktar meta dawn ma jinżlux tajjeb ma’ minn poġġiehom hemm.  Il-Kunsilli, kif jixhdu oħrajn ħabrieka madwar Malta u Għawdex, mhux qegħdin hemm biex jingħalqu bejn erba’ ħitan, ġo kamra wara s-swar, jew biex jirritaw ir-­residenti tal­-lokal jew tal-­lokalitajiet ġirien.  Hemm bżonn li kunsilli bħal dawn joħorġu minn wara s-­swar, kemm dawk fiżiċi, kif ukoll dawk psikoloġiċi, u jimxu id f’id mar­-residienti u l­-ġirien jekk iridu għarfien tax-xogħol tagħhom.

Imma kull azzjoni għanda reazjzoni kif jgħidu, u din narawha anki fil-qasam soċiologiku. Dan ġara meta l­-mexxejja, f’dan il-­każ dawk tal-lokal, agħżlu li jinqatgħu minn nies. Naraw li minn qalb in­-nies nibtu dawk li ma kienux jistgħu jifiħu aktar għal din l-­apatija u xogħolijiet li ma jaqblux magħhom. U hekk ġara wkoll hawn. Tliet Rabtin, Joseph Sultana, Karistu Abela, u Chris Farrugia, haduha fuqhom biex ma jħallux din il-­ħsara ambjentali tkompli ssir, qisu ma kien qed jiġri xejn fir­-Rabat, u r-Rabtin irrabjati mingħajr għajnuna minn ħadd. Għamlu kumitat ta’ azzjoni u marru jippreżentaw ittra f’Kastilja nhar il­-Ħamis 7 ta’ Marzu.

Ma nistax ma nistaqsiex ukoll. Xi tgħid il­-MEPA li hija il­-kelb tal­-għassa dwar affarijiet ambjentali? Veru li kważi sa tagħlaq sena lid-Direttorat tal-­Ambjent għadu mhux taħt ir-­responsabbiltà tal-Minsteru responsabbli għall­-Ambjent u jidher li qishom qed iħossuhom  li r­responsabbiltà ambjentali mhux tagħhom. Imma r­-responabbiltà ambjentali għada tal­-MEPA kollha kemm hi. Xi kultant, b’dispjaċir kbir u kontra qalbi ngħid u nħoss li qisha ­kelb tal-­għassa bħal dawk li hemm biswit fil-kura tal-SPCA. Dawn ma jitniffsu xejn sakemm xi ħadd iħabbat fuq il-­bieb. Nispera li l-MEPA tieħu azzjoni wara dan it-­taħbit kollu fuq biebha dwar ir­-responsabbiltà tagħha għall-ħarsien tal-ambjent, li sa xħin qed nikteb għadha ma qalet xejn lanqas.

Jiena konvint li wara ż­-żjara tar­-Rabtin f’Kastillja, nisimgħu minn għand il-­MEPA. B’din it­-taħbita ma jistgħux ma jqumux mill­-apatija li għandhom lejn il-­ħarsien tal­-ambjent ta’ pajjiżna, li mingħajr dubju huwa tagħna lkoll.

aebaldacchino@gmail.com

 


Rabat Road Rubble Walls

December 21, 2013

times

The rubble wall approach

Saturday, 21st December, 2013.

Alfred E. Baldacchino

Summer of 2011 saw Transport Malta working on the Rabat road in connection with the arrival of the Arriva public transport. An interchange with two bus stops was planned adjacent to the road leading to Ta’ Qali.

How the rubble wall protection regulations was brought to disrepute for one and all to see

2011 – the brick wall replacing the rubble wall along Rabat road.

Two stretches of protected rural rubble walls, one on each side of the road were illegally brought down and replaced by a brick wall. The plans also included tree mutilations, at that time so reminescent of Transport Malta: a number of protected Aleppo Trees more than 50 years old in this Outside Development Zone felt the brunt and the chainsaw, one with a substantial limb cut off, some had nails driven in them, and others engulfed in concrete (‘Trees, rubble walls and BSS’, August 26, 2011).  

2011-08-24-chopped-aleppo-pine

2011 – The brutal pruning of the protected Aleppo Pine, carried out by MEPA’s approval.

Mepa, the environmental watchdog, watched from a distance in its Floriana ravelin. When public criticism escalated, and the brick walls were completed, Mepa, through a letter in the Times (06.09.11) informed the public that it had given “Transport Malta up to 15 days to remove the illegality, following which Mepa may then take direct action.” 15 day passed, followed by 15 weeks and the brick walls were still standing. After the lapse of about another 15 months – during which Mepa, was still ruminating on its impotency to control the mauling of environmental and public assets, presumably still contemplating its original 15 days deadline – the brick walls were pulled down. And lo and behold, they were replaced by iron railings ­ as illegal as the brick walls they replaced in the rubble wall breach!

According to the Rubble Wall and Rural Structures (Conservation and Maintenance Regulations, 1997, a “rubble wall” means a dry stone wall, built-in loose, unhewn stones which stands by gravity and friction without the use of mortar. Furthermore, it is unlawful to demolish or to endanger by any means whatsoever, the stability or integrity of any rubble wall, or to prevent free percolation of rainwater through the structure of a rubble wall, or to undermine the foundations of such rubble wall.

Rumours had it that a roundabout was planned at the cross-section to Ta’ Qali, including more tree mutilations and uprooting of some of the old protected Aleppo Pines. But before such plans were put into action the date for the general election was announced.

2013.12.02 - new rubble wall

November 2013 – the new rubble wall replacing the iron railing which replaced the brick wall built-in 2011

Last month, heavy machinery descended on the area. The iron railings disappeared. Instead two rubble walls rose from beneath the street level, incorporating also two bus stops. Not only the old Aleppo Pines were not touched, but the suffocating concrete around their trunks was broken up to allow for a water trench. Even the nails which were driven in the tree

2013.12.02 - new water trench for trees

November 2013 – new water trenches replacing concrete around old protected trees

trunks during 2011 were removed. From the works on site, it seems that there are no plans for any roundabout. Pity that the new rubble walls surface were covered with cement which will prevent free percolation of rainwater through the structure, contrary to the above mentioned regulations. Rubble walls are protected amongst others, because they afford a habitat for flora and fauna.

2013.12.02 - cement covered rubble wall

November 2013 – the unfortunate decision of covering the newly built rubble walls with concrete

It seems though that there is a little flicker of light (and of hope) at the end of the tunnel and that, at least in this case, the planning and adjustment of roads is not at the whims and fancies of an uncontrolled bulldozer, but subject to professional planning and environmental management, although this can be bettered. One hopes that this approach, a bit more refined, is extended and taken in consideration in other development projects, whether on land or at sea.  If this becomes the rule of thumb, then one can hopefully look at the day when environment and development ­ not excluding landscaping ­ can walk hand in hand with mutual economical, social and ecological benefits. In the meantime one can only keep one’s fingers crossed and hope that Mepa’s unprofessional interpretation of its vision will be something of the past, for the good of the country and this and future generations.

fingerscrossed


Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja

November 18, 2013

L-Orizzont fit-22 ta’  Ottubru, 2013 ippublika aħbar dwar il-massakru tas-siġar fis-Saqqajja r-Rabat.

Jien  ikkumentajt fuq din l-aħbar fit-29 ta’ Ottubru, 2013 , kif ukoll korrispondent ieħor minn Toronto l-Kanada.

Il-MEPA, l-Awtorità Kompetenti għall-ħarsien tas-siġar fil-gżejjer Maltin (għalmenu fuq il-karta biss) fid-9 ta’ Novembru, 2013, ħasset li kellha tikkoreġi xi kummenti li għamilt jien.

Illum 18 ta’ Novembru, 2013, l-Orizzont ippubblika l-ittra tiegħi bi tweġiba għall-kummenti tal-MEPA. Qiegħed nehemż dawn il-kummenti kollha fuq dan il-post.

Image

It-Tnejn, 18 ta’  Novembru 2013

Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja

Alfred E. Baldacchino

Sur Editur,

Nixtieq nirreferi għall-ittra tal-MEPA bi tweġiba għal ittra oħra, intitolata “Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja”, ir-Rabat, li dehret fil-ħarġa tal-ġurnal l-orizzont tas-Sibt, 9 ta’ Novembru, 2013. F’din l-ittra l-MEPA tgħid li:

1.  Fil-programm, is-CEO tal-MEPA qal li jekk siġra hija protetta hemm bżonn il-permess tal-MEPA biex din tinżabar jew tinqala’ minn postha, iżda jekk is-siġra mhijiex protetta, hemm bżonn biss il-permess tad-Dipartiment tal-Agrikultura.

Ir-regolamenti għall-ħarsien tas-siġar – Avviż Legali 200 tal-2011 – jgħid li l-awtorità kompetenti (jiġifieri l-MEPA) għandha tkun responsabbli għall­-amministrazzjoni, implimentazzjoni u inforzar ta’ dawn ir-regolamenti. Imkien f’dawn ir-regolamenti, jew f’xi oħrajn, ma hemm referenza għad-Dipartiment tal-Agrikultura.

Tista’ l-MEPA tagħmel referenza għal-liġi li turi li d-Departiment tal-Agrikultura huwa b’xi mod responsabbli legalment kif qiegħda tgħid hi? Jiddispjaċini ngħid li l-MEPA qiegħda tipprova titfa’ r-responsabbiltà tagħha fuq Ministeru ieħor li ma għandu l-ebda obbligu legali, biex tgħatti xturha.

2.  Il-MEPA qalet ukoll li mill-investigazzjoni tagħha sabet li ma kien hemm l-ebda ksur ta’ regolamenti. Dan, għax kif qalet, mir-ritratti tal-ajru, dawn is-siġar miżbura għandhom inqas minn 50 sena. Ma nafx x’ritratti għandha l-MEPA u minn fejn ġabet dawn ir-ritratt u d-dati. Kull min hu tal-età tiegħi u hu mir-Rabat bħali, jaf li dawn is-siġar għandhom sewwa viċin it-80 sena. Jekk it-tagħrif li għandha l-MEPA biex toħroġ permessi tal-bini huwa ta’ dan it-tip, mhux ta’ b’xejn fil-pajjiż hawn din il-qerda kollha tal-ambjent naturali.

saqqajja trees5

Ritratt mehud fl-1961 li juri s-siġar tas-Saqqajja fejn diġà jidhru li kellhom madwar il-15-il sena. Imma mir-ritratti li għandha l-MEPA dawn is-siġar għad ma għadnhomx 50 sena.

3.  Il-MEPA qalet ukoll li skont l-Avviż Legali 200 tal-2011, siġar tal-Fikus jeħtieġu permess tal-MEPA biex jinżabru jekk huma ixjaħ minn 50 sena u jinsabu fl-ODZ, Żoni Protetti jew UCA. Dan juri l-istat miskin ta’ kif il-MEPA ħarbtet ir-regolamenti fl-2011 (għax xi ħadd hekk ried) biex il-qerda tas-siġar li qiegħda sseħħ, kemm mill-kuntrattur tal-Gvern, kemm minn xi kunsilli lokali, insomma minn min irid jeqred jew ibiċċer, ikun jista’ jagħmel fl-urban mingħajr ebda permess mingħand ħadd.

Dan kollu minkejja li, skont l-ewwel sentenza fil-viżjoni tal-MEPA ippubblikata fuq il-websajt tagħha stess, u se nikkwota:

L-għan tagħna huwa li ngħaddu lit-tfal tagħna pajjiż aħjar minn dak li writna. Huwa minħabba f’hekk li aħna nqabblu l-ambjent ma’ teżor, xi ħaġa li nużaw l-enerġija tagħna biex inħarsu, biex nieħdu ħsieb u biex intejjbu. L-ambjent jiġbor kollox: in-natura, il-kultura u anki l-wirt arkitettoniku, bliet u rħula, il-kampanja, l-ibħra u l-arja. Aħna nemmnu li flimkien għandna bil-għaqal nippjanaw biex il-wirt tagħna, din il-ġawhra li aħna ngħożżu, ma tgħibx għal dejjem.

saqqajja trees3

Kif kienu jinżabru s-siġar minn missiriejiitna. Dawn ma kellhom l-ebda viżjoni miktuba imma din kienet tidher fix-xogħol tagħhom fuq l-art.

U tagħlaq billi, fost oħrajn, tgħid: “Il-valuri li jispirawna biex nilħqu l-obbligi tagħna huma dawk li jħallu effett pożittiv fuq is-soċjetà. Il-valuri huma marbutin ma’ ġustizzja murija f’deċiżjonijiet għaqlin u f’waqthom u infurzati b’mod ġust. Jekk aħna napplikaw dawn il-valuri b’determinazzjoni, inkunu qed ngħinu biex infasslu il-ġid komuni, kunċett li huwa riżultat tal-għeruq Kristjani ta’ dan il-pajjiż. Dawn il-valuri, applikati b’mod professjonali, jagħtu evidenza tal-integrità tal-Awtorità f’dak kollu li tagħmel u li tgħid.

Kif ġabuhom is-siġar illum.  Imma kif dan il-pajjiż tilef kull sengħa, kull pġrofessjonalità, kull rispett, u tilef ruħhu għall-flus.

Kif inżabru l-istess sigar meta għandna l-MEPA li għandha vijżoni  miktuba, imma ma tidher imkien fix-xogħol tagħha fuq l-art.

Filwaqt li din il-viżjoni ma hemm xejn x’wieħed jgħid fiha, il-mod kif il-MEPA qiegħda timxi magħha jew iġġiegħlek tidħak jew tibki, speċjalment meta din l-awtorità hi mħallsa minn flus il-poplu biex tħares dak li hu tal-poplu. Jekk hix il-MEPA li qed tidħak bil-poplu jew hux il-poplu li qed jidħak bil-MEPA inħalli f’idejkom.

Illum il-poplu huwa aktar intelliġenti u għandu kuxjenza b’saħħitha favur l-ambjent. Il-MEPA tista’ taħseb li b’xi mod tista’ tgħaddi l-poplu minn għajn il-labra. Lili mhux biss ma tikkonvinċinix imma ma niddejjaq xejn ngħid li l-MEPA, wara li l-ewwel ħatfet id-Dipartiment tal-Ambjent, illum ġabitu fix-xejn, u nqisha li hija l-akbar għadu tal-ambjent naturali fil-gżejjer Maltin.

orizzont small

is-Sibt, 9 ta’ Novembru 2013.

 PETER GINGELL, Maniġer tal-Komunikazzjoni, MEPA

“Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja”

Sur Editur,
Nirreferi għall-ittra lill-Editur li dehret fil-ġurnal l-orizzont nhar it-Tlieta, 29 ta’ Ottubru 2013, mibgħuta mis-Sur Alfred Baldacchino taħt it-titlu “Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja”.
Fl-ittra tiegħu is-Sur Baldacchino qal li s-CEO tal-MEPA, waqt programm ta’ diskussjoni fuq One TV, kien skorrett meta qal li l-qlugħ u ż-żbir tas-siġar huma r-responsabbiltà tad-Dipartiment tal-Agrikultura.
Il-MEPA trid tiċċara li s-Sur Baldacchino għażel li jikkwota parti minn dak li qal iċ-CEO tal-MEPA, is-Sur Johann Buttigieg.
Fil-programm, is-CEO tal-MEPA qal li jekk siġra hija protetta hemm bżonn il-permess tal-MEPA biex din tinżabar jew tinqala’ minn postha, iżda jekk
is-siġra mhijiex protetta hemm, bżonn biss il-permess tad-Dipartiment tal-Agrikultura.
Fil-każ fejn numru ta’ siġar tal-Fikus ġew miżbura fis-Saqqajja, ir-Rabat, il-MEPA wara li għamlet l-investigazzjoni tagħha sabet li ma kien hemm l-ebda ksur ta’ regolament. Dan għax mir-ritratti tal-ajru, dawn s-siġar miżbura għandhom inqas minn 50 sena.
Skont l-Avviż Legali 200 tal-2011, siġar tal-Fikus jeħtieġu permess tal-MEPA biex jinżabru jekk huma ixjaħ minn 50 sena u jinsabu fl-ODZ, Żoni Protetti jew UCA.

orizzont small

 

It-Tlileta 29 ta’ Ottubru, 2013.

ALFRED E. BALDACCHINO,
“Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja”

Sur Editur,
Qrajt b’interess ir-rapport intitolat “Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja, ir-Rabat” ippubblikat fil-ħarġa ta’ l-orizzont ta’ nhar it-Tlieta, 22 ta’ Ottubru.
Din il‑qerda ta’ siġar f’pajjiżna issa ilha għaddejja s-snin. Hija qerda bla rażan, bla raġuni, u milli jidher bla ħadd mhu lest li jerfa’ reponsabbiltà għaliha.
Il-fragmentazzjoni li teżisti fil-ħarsien tas‑sigar mhi qiegħda tgħin xejn biex is-siġar li qegħdin jikbru f’pajjiżna jkunu mħarsin kif suppost.
Ftit tal-ħin ilu kont qiegħed nara programm ta’ diskussjoni fuq ONE TV fejn is-CEO tal-MEPA qal li l-ilqugħ u ż-żbir tas-siġar huma responsabbiltà tal-
Agrikultura. Dan mhux korrett. Din ir-responsabbiltà kienet hemm taħt ir-regolamenti l-qodma tal-2001. Imma dawn ġew revokati u mibdula mill-MEPA stess fil-2011.
Illum il-MEPA hija l-awtorità kompetenti għall-ħarsien tas-siġar skont ir-regolamenti tal-ħarsien tagħhom li għamlet hi stess.
Naħseb li hemm bżonn immedjat li l-Prim Ministru jindirizza din il-fragmentazzjoni llum qabel għada biex ma tkompliex issir aktar qerda.
ALFRED E. BALDACCHINO,
Ħ’Attard
Sur Editur,
Wara li fil-ħarġa ta’ l-orizzont ta’ nhar it-Tlieta, 22 ta’ Ottubru, qrajt l-artiklu taħt ir-ras “Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja, ir-Rabat”, inkompli nistaqsi lili
nnifsi, għax milli jidher dawk responsabbli qatt ma ħassew l-obbligu li jagħtu kont ta’ għemilhom, x’inhi r-raġuni ta’ dan iż-żbir tas-siġar, speċjalment
b’dan il-mod selvaġġ.
Jien, fl-opinjoni tiegħi, naħseb li kull ma qiegħed isir hu li s-siġar qegħdin jaqtgħu nifishom għax dawn mill-weraq jieħdu n-nifs.
Jien ngħix f’Toronto, belt mimlija siġar. Tant hawn siġar illi jekk jibdew jiżbruhom, kieku ma jispiċċaw qatt.
ĠORĠ IL-QORMI,
Toronto – il-Kanada

 

orizzont small

Aħarijiet

22 ta’ Ottubru, 2013

Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja, ir-Rabat

saqqajja trees
Għal darb’oħra f’pajjiżna qegħdin naraw massakru minn għadd ta’ siġar meta dawn jinżabru. Laħħar każ seħħ fis-Saqqajja r-Rabat. Dawn is-siġar ma ġralhomx bħas-siġar tal-Ħamrun li ż-żbir tagħhom twaqqaf meta saru għadd ta’ rapporti. Sfortunatament dawn is-siġar kollha nżabru b’mod mill-aktar selvaġġ.
Għalkemm jidher li saru xi rapporti qiegħed jingħad li dawn is-siġar m’għandhomx 50 sena. Minkejja dan huma diversi dawk ir-Rabtin li llum għandhom minn 75 sena ’l fuq, li qegħdin isostnu li dawn is-siġar tat-tip Fikus Nitida ilhom fil-Pjazza tas-Saqqajja aktar minn 50 sena.
Rabti li tkellem magħna qalilna li “ma nistax nifhem kif dawn is-siġar jinżabru b’dan il-mod. Li jinżabru hu tajjeb, imma mhux jitħallew kważi għerja għal kollox mill-weraq”. L-istess resident qalilna li “fir-Rabat għandna kwistjoni oħra fuq siġar li jinsabu fi Triq Santa Rita u li s’issa qed jiġu indikati li se jinqalgħu bħala parti minn proġett. Nisperaw li dan ma jsirx. Illum dawn joffru ftit dell għal min ipoġġi taħthom, jekk jinqalgħu xemx biss se jkun hemm,” sostna l-istess resident.


Ir-Rabat, is-Saqqajja u s-Siġar

October 29, 2013
orizzont
It­-Tieta, 29 ta’ Ottubru, 2013

Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja

Alfred E. Baldacchino

saqqajja trees1

Sur Editur,
Qrajt b’interess ir-rapport intitolat “Massakru minn si­ġar fis-Saqqajja, ir-Rabat” ippubblikat fil-ħarġa ta’ l-orizzont ta’ nhar it-Tlieta, 22 ta’ Ottubru.
Din il‑qerda ta’ siġar f’pajjiżna issa ilha għaddejja s-snin. Hija qerda bla rażan, bla raġuni, u milli jidher bla ħadd mhu lest li jerfa’ reponsabbiltà għaliha.
Il-fragmentazzjoni li teżisti fil-ħarsien tas‑sigar m’hi qiegħda tgħin xejn biex is-siġar li qegħdin jikbru f’pajjiżna jkunu mħarsin kif suppost.
Ftit tal-ħin ilu kont qiegħed nara programm ta’ diskussjoni fuq ONE TV fejn is-CEO tal-MEPA qal li l-ilqugħ u ż-żbir tas-siġar huma responsabbiltà tal-Agrikultura. Dan mhux korrett. Din ir-responsabbiltà kienet hemm taħt ir-regolamenti l-qodma tal-2001. Imma dawn ġew revokati u mibdula mill-MEPA stess fil-2012.
Illum il-MEPA hija l-awtorità kompetenti għall-ħarsien tas-siġar skont ir-regolamenti tal-ħarsien tagħhom li għamlet hi stess.
Naħseb li hemm bżonn immedjat li l-Prim Ministru jindirizza din il-fragmentazzjoni llum qabel għada biex ma tkompliex issir aktar qerda.

ALFRED E. BALDACCHINO,
Ħ’Attard

ITTRA OĦRA LIL DEHRET MAL-­ITTRA TIEGĦI

Sur Editur,
Wara li fil-ħarġa ta’ l-orizzont ta’ nhar it-Tlieta, 22 ta’ Ottubru, qrajt l-artiklu taħt ir-ras “Massakru minn siġar fis-Saqqajja, ir-Rabat”, inkompli nistaqsi lili nnifsi, għax milli jidher dawk responsabbli qatt ma ħassew l-obbligu li jagħtu kont ta’ għemilhom, x’inhi r-raġuni ta’ dan iż-żbir tas-siġar, speċjalment b’dan il-mod selvaġġ.
Jien, fl-opinjoni tiegħi, naħ­seb li kull ma qiegħed isir hu li s-siġar qegħdin jaqtgħu nifishom għax dawn mill-weraq jieħdu n-nifs.
Jien ngħix f’Toronto, belt mimlija siġar. Tant hawn siġar illi jekk jibdew jiżbruhom, kieku ma jispiċċaw qatt.

ĠORĠ IL-QORMI,
Toronto – il-Kanada

 

ARA WKOLL

https://alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/u-l-qerda-tas-sigar-tkompli-bl-istess-ritmu/


U l-qerda tas-siġar tkompli bl-istess ritmu

October 23, 2013

U l-qerda tas-siġar tkompli bl-istess ritmu

Alfred E. Baldacchino

L-Erbgħa 24 ta’ Ottubru, 2013.

Wara kampanja twila kontra l-­qerda tas-­siġar f’pajjiżna, wieħed kien jistenna’ li bil-­bidla fil-­gvern kien ikun hemm xi ħjiel ta’ xi miżuri biex dan jibda’ jsir b’mod regolat u bi professjonalità. Imma b’dispjaċir wieħed jinnota li l­qerda, iż­-żbir bla rażan, in-­nuqqas ta’ apprezzament, id-­dilettantiżmu, in­-nuqqas ta’ rieda u interess, u l­isparpaljar ta’ fondi pubbliċi għadu għaddej bl-­istess ritmu li kien għaddej qabel l­-elezzjoni, minkejja xi wegħdiet.

Dan kollu sforz il­-fragmentazzjoni li hemm bħalissa f’dawn ir-­responsabbiltjiet li kulħad qe ifarfr u jgħid li mhux tiegħu.

Mela għandna l-­Ministru tat­-Transport u l-­Infrastruttura li huwa responsabbli mill-­landscaping. Is­-Segretarju Parlamentari fil­-Ministeru tal-­Prim Ministru responsabbli mill-­MEPA li hija l-­Awtorità Kompetenti għall­-Ħarsien tas-­siġar; u l­-Ministru tal-­Kunsilli Lokali li huwa responsabbli mill-­Kunsilli Lokali. Hemm ukoll il-­Ministru tal­-Ambjent li bnir-raġun ma għandu l­-ebda responsabbiltà fejn jidhlu s-­siġar minħabba din il-­fragmentazzjoni ta’ responsabbiltajiet.

Is-sura ta' dwn is-Siġar turi l-mentalita mikina u l-kultura kontemporanja taż dan il-pajjż

Is-sura ta’ dawn is-Siġar turi l-mentalita miskina u egoistika, l-kultura kontemporanja ta’ dan il-pajjż

Is-­sit eletroniku Rabti People who like or live in Rabat Malta poġġa ritratt ta’ dan il-massakru fuq is-­sit eletroniku permess ta’ Chris Farrugia fl-­interess tar­Rabat, tar-­Rabtin, u anki tal-­biodiversità Maltija, hekk kif beda dan il­-massakru fuq is­-siġar tas­-Saqqajja r-­Rabat. Skont kummenti fuq dan is-­sit ix-­xogħol ġie mqabbad mill­-Kunsill Lokali tar­Rabat u ma għandniex xi ngħidu sejjer jitħallas minn flus il­-poplu. In-­numru ta’ kummenti fuq dan is­-sit kienu mijiet, u l­-karba tal-­poplu Rabti għal din il­-qerda hija kbira. Wieħed jistenna’ biex jara kemm sejjer jismagħha l­-Gvern.

Qiegħed inpoġġi l-­kummenti li għamilt jien kemm fuq dan is­-sit kif ukoll fuq siti oħra li siltu xi ­kummenti minnu u tefgħuhom fuq siti tagħhom. Qiegħed ukoll inżid l­-indirizz eletroniku fejn dehru u xi ritatti biex wieħed jekk irid ikun jista’ jara l-­istampa kollha u l-­kummneti tagħna r-Rabtin, ma’ oħrajn li jaqblu magħna, saħansitra anki barra xtutna.

THE TREE BUTCHERY CONTINUES ­– 19 ta’ Ottubru 2013

https://www.facebook.com/groups/rabatmalta/10151935648499645/?notif_t=group_comment_reply

SIĠAR IMMASAKRATI 2013 – Is-Saqajja — 19 ta’ Ottubru 2013

Christopoher Farrugia with Astrid Vella and 3 others– The latest attack on trees took place two days ago at Saqqajja, Rabat, reducing the former row of majestic trees to ugly, bare and leggy branches topped by a few leaves! Now MEPA is defending this Rabat Local Council action, saying that the trees can be ‘pruned’ savagely as they are not over 50 years old, when in fact elderly Rabat residents remember them already grown 75 years ago!

THE TREE BUTCHERY CONTINUES ­ – 19 ta’ Ottubru 2013

https://www.facebook.com/groups/rabatmalta/10151935648499645/?notif_t=group_comment_reply

Alfred E. Baldacchino – Chris, prosit talli bdejt din it-thread fuq ir-Rabat u minn veru jħobbu speċjalment fuq dawn il-ħniżriet ta’ żbir li llum mhux ir-residenti tar-Rabat biss, imma l-Maltin u l-Għawdxin kollha qed jilmentaw minn dan in-nuqqas ta’ professjonalità. Il-Kunsill Lokali tar-Rabat imissu jistħi meta hawn din il-kritika kollha u jibqa’ għaddej qisu qed jgħix fiq xi pjanetà oħra. Imma l-Kunsilli Lokali li huma fformati mir-rapreżentanti tal-partiti politiċi, suppost għandhom il-barka kemm tal-Ministeri mill-Kunsilli Lokali kif ukoll mill-Ministeru responsabbli għall-MEPA biex setgħu jagħmlu dawn l-oxxenitajiet.

saqqajja trees3

Kif kienu jinżabru mill-ħġaddiema tal-Gvern is-siġar tas-Saqqajja fl-imgħoddi meta la kellhom cherry pickers u lanqas srieraq mekkaniċi. Dawn huma l-istess siġar li jidhru fir-ritratt ta’hawn fuq. wara li nżabru il-ġimgħa li għaddiet.

Nixtieq inkun naf min qed jgħati dawn il-pariri professjonali lill-Kunsill Rabti. Kif taf int Chris jiena llum għandi 67 sena. Niftakar meta kont għadni mbuttat fil-pushchair biex inmorru l-ġnien kont narahom hemm. U dan kellhom aktar minn 10 snin fil-wisa’. Forsi l-MEPA għadhom ma jafux jgħoddu… is- siġar. Imma il-MEPA la qatt kellhom u lanqas għandhom interess li jħarsu s-sigar u l-pjanti oħra indiġeni Maltin. Jekk tħares kif amendatw ir-regolamenti tal-Ħarisen tas-Siġar tal-2001 u kif dawn il-MEPA biddlithom fl-2012 biżżejjed biex wieħed jara kemnm il-MEPA hija interessata. Illum il-MEPA kważi kważi saret aġenżija tal-iżviluppaturi. Nixtieq inkun naf b’dan it-tqaċċit tas-siġar kollha għal kemm il-siġra il-MEPA oġġezzjonat. Bil-politika tal-MEPA, minkejja kemm bil-pjanijiet tal-gvern ta’ qabel (imfasswlin mill-MEPA stess) kemm b’dawk tal-gvern ta’ issa tidher li tiġi taqa’ u tqum. Ħares ftit lejn il-permess li tgħat fix-xogħol tal-foss tal-Imdina fejn inqerdu tant siġar biex il-foss inkesa bit-turf u ġabet is-swar tal-Imdina qishom Windsor Castle. Naturalment xi ħadd qala balla flus. Dan jidher aktar importanti minn xi 300 siġra (waħda minnhom żebbuġa li kellha viċin il-100 sena u li nqalgħet bil-barka tal-MEPA) kollha inqerdu.

Kien hemm suġġeriment aktar ‘l fuq biex fir-Rabat jitwaqqaf grupp jew kumitat dwar il-ħarsein tas-siġar u l-ambjent naturali Rabti. Jekk timxi din l-idea għidluli għax inkun minn ta’ quddiem bħala Rabti li noffri l-ħin biex inkun fuqu. Ma niflax nara aktar oxxenitajiet minn nies li jieħdu deċiżijoniet u ma jagħrfux siġra minn arblu tad-dawl. U mbgħad iwaħħlu f’ħadd ieħor. Ikun interessanti wkoll li l-politikant responsabbli mill-Kunsilli Lokali u dak mill-MEPA jgħidu kif jaħsbuha.

THE TREE BUTCHERY CONTINUES ­ – 19 ta’ Ottubru 2013

https://www.facebook.com/groups/rabatmalta/10151935648499645/?notif_t=group_comment_reply

Kif ġabuhom is-siġar illum.  Imma kif dan il-pajjiż tilef kull sengħa, kull pġrofessjonalità, kull rispett, u tilef ruħhu għall-flus.

Kif ġabuhom is-siġar illum. Imma kif dan il-pajjiż tilef kull sengħa, kull professjonalità, kull rispett, u tilef  anki ruħhu għall-flus.

Alfred E. Baldacchino – Allura biex inkun naf x’gara irrid immur il-Kunsill tar-Rabat? Irrid nifhem li l-Kunsill kellu jdejh marbutin biex iwqqaf dawn l-oxxenitajiet? Sa fajn naf jien il-membri tal-Kunsill qegħdin hemm biex jaraw u jirrapreżentaw in-nies tar-Rabat. Ma naħsebx li dan il-pajjiż huwa xi wieħed minn dawk ta’ wara dik li darba kienet il-purtiera tal-ħadid. Jekk il-Kunsill għandu spjegazzjoni jgħidlna. Jekk qed jipproteġi lil xi hadd, jiddispjaċini ngħid li r-responsabbiltà hija xorta waħda tiegħu u tal-Ministeru lli jaqa’ taħtu. Imma ma rridx neħodha kontra l-Kunsill tar-Rabat. Jekk dan jitkellem u jafda man-nies Rabtin li tellgħuh, imexxi aħjar u mingħajr wisq problemi, speċjalment jekk ikollu xi pressjoni minn nies mhux mir-Rabat. Xi ħadd qal li dawn is-sigar hemm bżonn jinbidlu! Ma nagħmlux mod li hemm xi ħadd qed ifesfes f’widnejn xi ħadd biex dawn jinbidlu u minflokom jitħawlu siġar mill-Afrika t’isfel, mill-Amerika t’isfel u minn kull parti oħra tad-dinja, bħal dawk li ħawlu fil-Kottonera u kullimkien. Tgħid għalhekk din is-segretezza kollha? Hemm minn bi ħsiebu jaqla xi skoss flus minn fuq dahar il-poplu bil-bejgħ tas-sigar barranin?

Xi ħadd ieħor qal li lanqas tista’ tpoġġi fuq bank minħabba l-għasafar. Kumment fqir u tat-tfal. Mur daqsxejn sa’ Ħad Dingli (mhux ‘l bogħod) u ara kif il-Kunsill ta’ Ħad Dingli solva din il-problema bla wisq spejjes u bla wisq teatrin. Naħseb li n-nies tar-Rabat huma intelliġenti biżżejjed jekk iridu. Imma minn ċerti kummenti li qed jidhru qed nistenna għar.

THE TREE BUTCHERY CONTINUES ­ 19 ta’ Ottubru 2013

https://www.facebook.com/groups/rabatmalta/10151935648499645/?notif_t=group_comment_reply

Il-Bankijiet f'Ħad-Dingli

Il-Bankijiet f’Ħad-Dingli

Alfred E. Baldacchino – Bankijiet f’Ħad Dingli li jippermetti lilll-għasafar ikollhom kuxjenza safja kif ukoll lil minn ipoġġi fuq il-bankijiet biex ipoġġu b’rashom serħana. U ma nqatat l-ebda siġra u kellu jħallas għaliha l-kunsill kif sejjr jagħmel dak tar-Rabat.

iNEWS

Massakru minn sigar fis-Saqqajja

http://www.inewsmalta.com/dart/20131021-massakru-minn-sigar-fis-saqqajja

Alfred E., Baldacchino  – Hija ħaġa tal-­mistħija li sena wara sena, wieħed jara dan id-­dilettantiżmu u qerda ta’ siġar u ħadd ma jieħu responsabbiltà. Dan minkejja l-­kritika kontinwa taċ-­ċittadini li minn flushom qed iħallsu għal dan ix­-xogħol u qerda.

Dawn is­-siġar għandhom ’l fuq minn 70 sena minkejja dak li qalet il-­MEPA. Jiena Rabti u llum għandi 67. Dejjem hemm nafhom. Imma l­-MEPA…

Sfortuntament il-­MEPA la għandha u lanqas qatt kellha interess li tħares is-­­siġar, minkejja l­-obbligi legali u morali li għandha. U dan jispjega għaliex ir­­regolamenti tal-2001 ġew mibdula mill­­-MEPA fl’2012. Possibbli li lanqas is­­-Segretarju Parlamentari responsbbli mill-­MEPA ma jista’ jagħmel xejn fuq hekk?

Xi Kunsilli Lokali ukoll qishom lanqas qegħdin hemm. Fir­-Rabat is-sena l-­oħra ġara l-­istess u milli jidher ma tgħallem xejn. U dan minkejja li qed iħallas il­-poplu għal dan ix-­xogħol xejn professjonali approvat u mqabbad mill­-Kunsill Lokali. Possibbli li s-­Segretarju Parlamentari responsabbli mill-­Kunsilli Lokali dan kollu ma jinteressahx?

Dan il­-qerda u xogħol bla sens u bl-­ebda professjonalità kienet bla kontrol taħt il­­-Gvern ta’ qabel. Imma jiddispjaċini ngħid li mhux talli ma rranġa xejn talli għada kif kienet qabel minkejja l-­kritika tan-­nies. Forsi l-­­Prim Ministru jista’ jinterveni hu u jwissi lil min għandu jwissi, dejjem sakemm ma jaqbelx hu wkoll ma’ dan it-­tip ta’ xogħol!

L-­Orizzont

http://www.orizzont.com.mt/FullArticle.php?ID1=’Ahbarijiet’&ID2=112053

Alfrd E. Baldaahino (kumment għall-pubblikazzjoni) Din il-­qerda ta’ siġar f’pajjiżna li issa ilha għaddejja s­-snin hija qerda bla rażan, bla raġuni, u milli jidher bla ħadd ma hu lest li jerfa’ reponsabbiltà għalijha. Il­-fragmentazzjoni li teżisti fil-­ħarsien tas-­sigar mhu qed tgħin xejn biex is­-siġar li qed jikbru f’pajjiżna jkunu mħarsa kif suppost.

Ritratt meħud fl-01963 fejn is-=siġar jidhru li għandhom sewwa vi1in il-15-il sena dak iż-żmien. Imma il-MEPA li qalet li dawn ma għadhomx aktar minn 50 sena, issa qed twaħħal fl-Agrikultura wara li qalgħatha barra mir-regolamenti.

Ritratt meħud fl-1961 fejn dawn is-siġar jidhru li għandhom sewwa viċin il-15-il sena dak iż-żmien. Imma il-MEPA li qalet li dawn ma għadhomx aktar minn 50 sena, issa qed twaħħal fl-Agrikultura wara li qalgħatha barra mir-regolamenti u llum ma għandha x’taqsam xejn.

Ftit tal-­ħin ilu (it­-Tlieta 22 ta’ Ottubru) kont qed nara programm ta’ diskussjoni fuq ONE TV fejn is­-CEO tal-­MEPA qal li l-­ilqugħ u ż-­żbir tas-­siġar huma responsabbiltà tal­-Agrikultura.  Dan mhux korrett. Din ir-­responsabbiltà kienet hemm taħt ir-­regolamenti l-­qodma tal­-2001.  Imma dan ġew revokati u mibdula mill­-MEPA stess fil-­2012. Illum il­-MEPA hija l­-Awtorità Kompetenti għall-­ħarsien tas­-siġar skond ir-­regolamenti tal­-ħarsien tagħhom li għamet hi stess.

Naħseb li hemm bżonn immedjat li l-­Prim Ministru jindirizza din il-­fragmentazzjoni illum qabel għada biex ma tkompliex issir aktar qerda.

Is-sbuħija tas-siġar ta' fuq is-Saqqajja ir-Rabat kif darba kienu u kif ma jistgħu ikunu qatt sakemm tinbidl din il-mentalit.a pulitika ta' pajjiżna.

Is-sbuħija tas-siġar ta’ fuq is-Saqqajja r-Rabat kif darba kienu u kif ma jistgħu jkunu qatt aktar sakemm tinbidl din il-mentalità  pulitika  u kulturali ta’ pajjiżna.


Qerda tal-biodiversità fil-foss tal-Imdina… biex isir ġnien ta’ kwalità!

September 28, 2012

Dan l-aħħar qrajna u smajna stqarrijiet minn Ministru tal-Gvern dwar ġonna ta’ kwalità u spazji miftuħa għall-familji.

Meta wieħed jaqra u jisma’ l-kummenti ta’ dan il-Ministru tal-Gvern li huwa responsabbli minn dawn il-proġetti, wieħed mill-ewwel jifhem għaliex illum il-qerda tal-ambjent naturali hija daqstant kbira. U wieħed ma jistax ma jistaqsiex numru ta’ misoqsijiet, bħal ngħidu aħna:

  1. Bliema immaġinazzjoni jista’ xi ħadd jgħid li sejjer jagħmel ġnien ta’ kwalità u fl-istess ħin jaqla’ u jeqred ammont kbir ta’ sigar b’impatt kbir fuq il-biodiversità tal post?  (ara ritratti aktar l-isfel).
  2. Kif jista’ wieħed jgħid li sejjer jagħmel ġnien ta’ kwalità u fl-istess ħin jiksi l-post b’medda wiesgħa ta’ konkos; konkos aktar milli hemm u aktar milli kien hemm siġar qabel ma beda x-xogħol? (ara ritratti aktar l-isfel)
  3. Liema raġuni xjentifika tiġġustifika li biex isir ġnien ta’ kwalità titqaxxar u tinqered il-liedna kollha li kien hemm fil-post u li kienet tħaddar u tiksi metri kwadri kbar tal-ħajt tal-ġnien Howard Gardens (mhux mal-ħajt tas-sur) u li kienet toffri ambjent naturali għall-numru ta’ fawna indiġena? Din kienet ukoll issebbaħ u tgħati l-ħajja lill-kull ġnien anki jekk mhux ta’ kwalità. U dan minkejja li l-Gvern ta’ Malta huwa obbligat u marbut mill-Unjoni Ewropea biex jara li jieħu miżuri biex ma tkomplix tinqered il-biodiversità tal-Unjoni Ewropea li aħna parti minnha. Il-Ministri tal-Ambjent (anki dawk li jgħidu li xi darba kienu Ministri tal-Ambjent) din kollha jafuha, kemm mid-dokumenti tal-UE li jirċevu, kif ukoll mill-laqgħat tal-Kunsill tal-Ministri li jattendu.

Fid-diskors tiegħu fil-video li deher fil-ġurnal The Times

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120918/local/mdina-ditch-being-transformed-into-quality-garden.437446

dan il-Ministru qal li ma nqerdux siġar.  Jekk wieħed iħares lejn ir-ritratti hawn mehmuża, waħdu jasal f’konklużjoni waħda.

  1. Kif jista’ xi ħadd jgħid li dan ix-xogħol qed jerġa jieħu dan il-post għall-ġranet passati tal-glorja tiegħu?  Sa fejn naf jien fi żmien l-Għarab u l-Kavallieri ma kienux jużaw konkos (sakemm xi perit ma jikkoreġinix!) li llum huwa l-aktar ħaġa li tispikka f’dan il-ġnien (u ġonna oħra simili) ta’ kwalità. Lanqas kienu jiżirgħu turf  għax l-ilma għalihom kien jiswa mitqlu deheb, u lanqas kienu jagħmlu ilma ħiereġ jiżfen mill-art!  U lanqas ma kienu jużaw lift biex jinżlu mis-swar għall-foss. Jidher li l-Għarab u l-Kavallieri li ħakmu pajjiżna tant għexieren ta’ snin ilu, kellhom viżjoni ferm u ferm aktar professjonali, ekonomika, soċjali, ambjentali u sostenibbli milli għandhom il-mexxejja politiċi Maltin tal-lum, minkejja li dak iż-żmien ma kienx hemm obbligi ambjentali internazzjonali bħal ma għandna llum u lanqas kellhom Ministri tal- Ambjent.
  2. Ir-Rabtin u l-ġirien tagħhom  ma għandhomx bżonn xi politku li ma għandu l-ebda idea ta’ xi tfisser biodiversità biex jgħamillhom ġnien ta’ kwalità! U lanqas għandhom bżonn spazji miftuħa għall-familji għax għandhom biżżejjed spazji miftuha. Żgur li ma għandhomx bżonn ta’ spazju miftuħ ġo foss. U jekk kien hemm il-ħsieb li dan il-foss jinfetaħ għal kulħadd, kull ma kien hemm bżonn kien  li jitneħħew il-katnazzi li kienu jsakkru l-bibien li jgħalqu l-aċċess għal kulħadd. Li kieku dan id-diskors jintqal lill-kostitwenti ta’ min qalhom, li llum huma ferm u ferm konxji mill-ambjent naturali u l-qerda li l-konkos qed jagħmel lil dan l-ambjent, żgur li kienu jibgħatuh jistgħad biex forsi jaqbad xi mazzun!
  3. Imma veru li biex tagħmel ġnien ta’ kwalità illum l-ingredjenti huma: a) konkos; b) turf; c) ilma jiżfen; d)  issa anki lift; u e) l-qerda tal-biodiversità tal-post kollha, kif sar fil-foss tal-Imdina u f’kull hekk imsejjaħ ġnien ieħor li qed isir mill-istess ministeru?
  4. Ħarsa lejn il-kummenti li kien hemm fil-gazzetti f’dawn il-links

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120918/local/mdina-ditch-being-transformed-into-quality-garden.437446

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120919/local/Mdina-ditch-returned-to-glory.437501

u fir-ritratti li ħadt jien stess u li wħud minnhom jidhru hawn taħt, kollha jitkellmu u juru  d-disastru li sar bi flus pubbliċi u b’dawk tal-Unjoni Ewropea.

  1. Forsi hawnhekk ta’ minn jistaqsi minn qed jamministra l-fondi tal-UE, f’dan il-kas il-European Regional Development Fund?  Min qiegħed jawditjahom? Fejn jista’ l-pubbliku jara rendikont tal-infiq?
  2. Barra minhekk, minn qiegħed jara li jkun hemm diskussjoni pubblika fuq il-proġetti biex b’hekk ikun involut iċ-ċittadin fid-deċiżjoni, qabel jintefqu dawn il-flus? Dan ukoll huwa fost l-obbligi li titlob l-UE.
  3. Jiddispjaċini ngħid li l-ħsara li qed issir lill-biodiversità Maltija bi proġetti bħal dawn, bi skuża ta’ ġonna ta’ kwalità u spazji miftuħa għall-familji, trid aktar minn ġenerazzjoni biex titranġa.
  4. Dan il-ġnien sejjer ikollu kwalità waħda …. dik ta’  mafkar ta’ kif l-ambjent naturali qed jiġi sfruttat u mżeblaħ f’dawn l-aħħar snin, mingħajr ebda mistħija u ebda mgħodrija.
  5. Fl-aħħarnett min huma l-konsulenti tal-Ministru li huwa responsabbli biex jaraw li dan ix-xogħol ikun wieħed sostenibbli, jiġifieri li ma ssirx ħsara ekonomika, ħsara soċjali u ħsara ekoloġika kif qed issir?
  6. Nismagħhom jgħidu li hawn Malta kollox possibli, imma ma naħsebx li hawn xi ħadd li sab kif jgħatti x-xemx bl-għarbiel, għalkemm hawm min qed jipprova u qed jagħmel ħiltu kollha.

ARA WKOLL

http://www.orizzont.com.mt/Issues/19092012/social/article95864.html

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120918/local/mdina-ditch-being-transformed-into-quality-garden.437446

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120919/local/Mdina-ditch-returned-to-glory.437501

http://alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/environmentali…ent-over-trees

https://alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/once-there-were-green-leaves/

https://alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/massacre-of-md…eally-involved/

https://alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/government-policy-on-trees/

iL-BIODIVERSITA’   SINJURA TA’ QABEL BEDA X-XOGĦOL FIL-FOSS TAL-IMDINA U L-KWALITA’ TA’ QERDA LI SARET MINN META BEDA X-XOGĦOL FUQ IL-ĠNIEN TA’ KWALITA’

QABEL – Ringiela ta’ siġar taċ-Cipress li kienu jiffurmaw parti mill-biodiversità

WARA – L-unika siġra taċ-Cipress li baqa’ – MEJTA. L-oħrajn kollha nqalgħu u nqerdu. Ikun interessanti kieku l-esperti tal-Ministru jgħidulna kif mietet din is-siġra, jew aħjar jekk inqatletx b’xi kumbinazzjoni!  Ma naħsebx li issa sejjer ikun hemm xi ħadd li tniggżu l-kuxjenza biex jaqla’ siġra mejta, meta nqalgħu tant u tant siġar ħajjin minn dan il-post .

QABEL – ambjent naturali sinjur

WARA – parti mill- ġnien ta’ kwalità – anqas biodiversità, aktar konkos!

WARA – liedna  meqruda fil-ġnien ta’ kwalità

WARA – siġar taċ-Ċipress maqlugħa, meqruda  u mitfuha fl-art biex jagħmlu wisa għall-ġnien ta’ kwalità.

WARA – fdalijiet tas-siġar mejta taċ-Ċipress taħt it-tabella tal-Ministeru li qed jagħmel ġnien ta’ kwalità

QABEL U WARA – id-dehra tal-foss ftit wara li beda x-xogħol fuq il-ġnien ta’ kwalità.  Is-siġar immarkata b’salib isfar kollha ġew meqruda, jew maqlugħa.

WARA – post għeri mill-biodiversità fi ġnien ta’ kwalità fejn jispikka l-konkos u l-għibien tas-sigar li qabel kienu jżejnu dan il-post.

It-tabella imwarrba u mitluqa fl-art li madankollu turi l-għajuna finanzjarja li qed tgħati l-EU mill-European Regional Development Fund, għar-restawr tal-post, li qed isir fost oħrajn bit-tneħħija tal-biodiversità u kisi bil-konkos.


Once there were green leaves

July 31, 2012

maltastar

Tuesday, 31st July 2012

Once there were green leaves

Alfred E. Baldacchino

It is indeed of great satisfaction to see such a strong public awareness towards the appreciation of nature, also expressed towards the need for more protection and appreciation of trees. Such tree-appreciation includes the trees’ aesthetic, social, ecological, educational and intrinsic values. Unfortunately and regrettably, the greatest hurdle towards the achievement of such noble aims is the present policy being implemented by government.

With regret one sees and reads of hundreds of established trees being heavily pruned and deprived of any form of a tree and its majesty. The pruning and uprooting of trees, irrespective of the appropriate season, is being undertaken for a number of childish, amateurish reasons, such as that they are harmful to buildings, they attract birds which poo on the benches beneath, they are obscuring the view from people’s houses, they are dropping their leaves in front of people’s doors, and they are a pest. In most cases these are replaced with new exotic imported trees.  One must however, admit that there are instances where some trees need to be transplanted because of justifiable reasons, though not including any of the above.

Nobody responsible for landscaping in the islands, whether political or private, seems to officially appreciate the fact that trees contribute to control carbon dioxide and add oxygen to the air. They are also barriers to noise, and to the many obnoxious fumes and emissions with which our life is daily and increasingly exposed to. But a Lilliputian mentality unfortunately prevails, dominated by commercial gains. And what is more alarming and worrying, is that the destructive mentality is officially endorsed and publicly financed, sometimes even by European funds.

One of the projects which today tops the list of this poor, destructive mentality is the works going on at the Mdina ditch. It only tops the list because a similar project, about six years ago which was initiated at Buskett, a Natura 2000 site, was stopped in time by MEPA and Buskett was saved by the skin of its teeth, though some wounds still show.

Those who hail from Rabat and Mdina, and those who frequent this historical area have over the years benefited from the past professional landscapers with real love and understanding of the natural environment. Howard Gardens is a perfect example of a garden with short winding paths among the surrounding greenery, and also open spaces. The ditch was later planted with around 400 citrus trees, about a dozen Cyprus trees, adding to a dozen of old olive trees, and a majestic old Holm Oak. The latter guarded the left hand side entrance to Mdina, while and old Olive Tree stood on the right

Following such a government approved project paid by public and European funds, more than half the citrus trees, were uprooted when in bloom, and carted away. Only two Cyprus trees and two olive trees are now left. Even the old majestic Olive tree guarding Mdina Gate, was first fiercely pruned, and then uprooted and also carted away.  Such pruning and uprooting needed the endorsement of MEPA considering the age of the Olive tree. I very much doubt if MEPA has given its green light to uproot this protected tree. Yet the Lilliputian mentality backed by official authority had the last say.

(left) the remains of the once majestic, protected, old Olive Tree, waiting to be uprooted and carted away. (right) the moribund citrus tree, uprooted from a few meters away, which replaced the majestic protected old Olive Tree.

Initially it was said that the place was going to be transformed into a garden. The general public asked how one can plan to make a garden and in the process uproot scores of trees. Now it is being said that the place is going to be transformed into an open space for the family, as an advertisement board at the entrance of HowardGardens depicts. Most of the ditch area has already been covered in concrete, more concrete than tree-cover. And more and more areas, some previously covered with trees, will be used. Some of the citrus trees, all in bloom, were uprooted to be planted again a couple of metres away, in a regimental line-up.  It was also officially said that most of the area would be planted with turf, and there would also be water fountains! Considering the local climate, the eventual rise in temperature because of climate change, the heavy demand expected for water both by the general public and also by agriculture, one indeed shudders to think how government failed to foresee this and how such maintenance would negatively impact the island, both from a social, economical and ecological point of view.

One of the destructive actions which hurt me beyond any healing was the scraping and removing of Ivy (Liedna – an indigenous, Maltese wild species). This covered a substantial part of the boundary concrete wall along Howard Gardens, and the garden wall opposite the bastions. It was such a site to see, aesthetically pleasing, an adequate habitat for local rare fauna, especially some rare indigenous moths. Hailing from Rabat, I have seen this beautiful, majestic free nature’s gift, grow over the last 15 years or so. And yet, in about 15 hours or so it was gone, completely gone. The regulator (Government) and the operator (ELC) in their wisdom, which is neither accepted nor understood at all by nature lovers and biodiversity conservationists, decided to eliminate it completely. It would without any doubt have been an added asset to any project in the ditch, both if the area beneath is going to be turned into a garden, or if the area is going to become an open space for the family. What a pity, what a shame, what lack of ecological appreciation and awareness. It reminds me of 1970 when the ivy at Buskett was similarly and systematically removed and eliminated. The same mind is behind both destructions. No wonder that people have started to believe that government hates trees.

The indigenous Ivy adorning the boundary wall overlooking the Mdina ditch

Howard Gardens boundary wall cleared from Ivy

The accompanying photos shows nature’s gifts with all their beauty, which the private landscapers, paid by government were authorised to destroy. It also shows the greedy hands and the lack of biodiversity

The Mdina Ditch covered in rich greenery offering a natural habitat to both flora and fauna

Ivy and the natural habitat completely destroyed

appreciation.  The questions being asked are: When is the natural ecological beauty of these islands going to be positively appreciated? When shall environmental projects also take into consideration the economic, social and ecological aspect, and not be assessed just from the commercial point of view? When shall the people be heard and be able to contribute to the positive national development of our country?  When is government going to show real appreciation of trees. When shall we grow up? Unfortunately the destructive public-financed works at Mdina Ditch, besides others, show that despite EU membership, EU obligations and EU financial help, we still have a long, long way to go.

see also 

https://alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/environmentalists-vs-government-over-trees/

aebaldacchino@gmail.com

alfredbaldacchino.wordpress.com

Alfred E. Baldacchino has a M.Sc. in Environmental Planning and Management


Money doesn’t only grow on trees here, it talks too!

May 23, 2012

Wednesday, 23 May, 2012

Alfred E. Baldacchino
Money doesn’t only grow on trees here, it talks too!

The appreciation of trees in the Maltese Islands is gaining momentum in leaps and bounds. This is mainly due to newly-established environmental NGOs, individual interventions, more private education and public awareness and, no doubt, Malta’s accession to the European Union.
Regrettably, the official side is still dragging its feet, finding it very difficult to understand and keep pace with this public awareness. This despite national and international legal obligations and good-intentioned environmental actions plans.
When Legal Notice 12 of 2001 was revoked by LN 200 of 2011, the Department of Agriculture was exempted from any legal responsibility with regard to urban tree-protection. Public trees in urban areas can now be pruned, uprooted, cut up in logs, butchered and destroyed without any official prior approval, according to one’s whims and fancies. Rather strange!
Many readers might remember, that when the Department of Agriculture was still responsible for landscaping, street trees used to be pruned with dedication, care and feeling. I remember the ficus trees at Saqqajja, in Rabat, among others, so professionally pruned in a seemingly sculptured way with a crown extending from one end of the line to the other and with small branches forming a beautiful trellis. It gave the area a green soothing sight in contrast with the heavy congested traffic-zone.
At that time, the Department of Agriculture did not have as many resources as today’s “landscapers” have but they used to make miracles with as little public expenses as possible and with professional management.
Today, “landscaping” projects are farmed out; it seems to anyone who can handle a chainsaw. There is nothing wrong in farming out to professional entities that are au courant with national and international legislation. But these operators must be subjected to a regulator that decides what should be done and not be done, monitor expenses, prevent ecological negative impacts, incorporate such operations in formal and non-formal education and ensure that the operators are observing guidelines and decisions.
After all, this is a basic issue of governance: the regulator and the operator should not be one and the same entity. Notwithstanding, the absence of such regulator, the politician still has a responsibility to shoulder, more so when such works are paid from public funds.
The lack of regulatory measures has led to a farcical scenario where the public is completely in the dark about what farming out agreements providing for and how funds are being managed. Taking the Prime Minister on a tour to demonstrate the colourful flowers or to nurseries to view lace makers at work only fools the actors but not the people.
What the people want to hear is how public funds are being spent: how much is being spent overseas on the importation of trees, what is the cost of such trees, why are these not being grown in Malta, thus creating more jobs, more local expertise and benefiting from the multiplier effect besides preventing the introduction of invasive species.

This invasive species used in landscaping financed by Government and under the auspices of the Ministry of Resources and Rural Affairs, has already established itself in valleys, garigue and other wild habitats. This despite the fact the national and international obligation, including those of the EU, to prevent the introduction and to control invasive species. It also goes against the National Environment Policy published earlier this year, and the fact that it is listed as invasive by MEPA the Competent Authority on the Environment. The Ministry responsible for landscaping seems to be living in a republic of its own.
The photo was taken along one of the busiest roads in the Maltese Islands.

The standard reply given to these sorts of questions is that such data cannot be divulged because those involved in landscaping are private companies. And I was always under the impression that these were public private partnerships. US orator and politician, Patrick Henry (1736-1799) once wrote that the liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them. Seems that we still have a long way to go to reach the 18th century, despite being an EU member state.
It has now become customary that those who ask or comment in the national interest on the lack of governance, on professional tree management and on the lack of transparency on the use of public funds are looked upon as if they are enemies of the state. They are called names and are subjected to character assassination. It is so reminiscent of the 1980s.
Is there a real genuine desire for public consultations, suggestions and comments? The idea, of course, is not to point fingers at anybody.
In the history of landscaping in Malta, never have so few had a free hand and benefited at the expense of so many. It also seems that, in Malta, money does not only grow on trees but it talks too!
aebaldacchino@gmail.com

NOTE: The photo and its caption were not part of the original article in  The Times, but were added by the author on this post. Thelink to the original article is:

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120523/opinion/Money-doesn-t-only-grow-on-trees-here-it-talks-too-.420947


Trees, rubble walls and BSS

August 26, 2011

August 26, 2011

Trees, rubble walls and BSS

Alfred E. Baldacchino

A few weeks ago, workmen were laying out a pavement on either side of the Rabat road near the Ta’ Qali intersection. A layby for the new buses, I thought! And so it was.

Little thought, if any, was given either to the Aleppo pine trees and the rubble walls along the stretches of the new pavement. The Aleppo pines, which characterise this stretch of road leading to Rabat, show a number of scars, now including fresh ones, resulting from mismanagement. Some of the trees are completely engulfed in concrete, some with nails hammered in them, further sealing their miserable fate at the hands of unsustainable mismanagement of the living natural heritage.

Blatant infringement of the Trees and Woodland Protection Regulations published on 24 ta’ May, 2011, over the signature of the Prime Minister, the Minster responsible for the Environment.

In the same stretch, part of the rubble walls were also heavily damaged! In an ingeneous, indigenous way, a brick wall was built on the rubble wall. As I slowed in the traffic to clear the roundabout intersecting the Żebbuġ, Mtarfa and Rabat roads – the one where sprinklers usually water much of the road as much as they water the turf – I could not help think and ask myself how the lack of coordination between ministries reigns supreme in this land.

A 'newly restored rubble wall' . What about the regulations for the protection of rubble walls? Well that is the responsibility of the Minster for the Environment and not of the Minister responsible for such works!

A couple of weeks ago, the Malta Environment and Planning Authority declared new tree protection areas. In the same legal notice (200 of 2011), signed by the Prime Minister himself, there are two schedules of protected trees. The Aleppo pine trees along Rabat road are listed in schedule II. They are more than 50 years old and are growing in an outside development zone area.

The brutal fresh pruning of the protected Aleppo Pine, which could only have been carried out by approval from the Minister of Rural Affairs and the Minster for the Environmnet.

Schedule II trees are protected to the extent that no person shall bury in the ground, dump, or deposit, any soil, manure, waste, rubbish, stones, rubble, scrap metal or any refuse near them; not even attempt to. Mepa is responsible for the administration, implementation and enforcement of these regulations.

How the rubble wall protection regulations were brought to disrepute for one and all to see

Legal Notice 160 of 1997 protects rubble walls and non-habitable rural structures in view of their historical and architectural importance, their exceptional beauty, their affording a habitat for flora and fauna and their vital importance in the conservation of the soil and of water. It is unlawful to demolish them or to prevent free percolation of rainwater through rubble walls or to undermine the foundations of a rural construction.
The regulations add that no permit is required for sensitively executed repairs, provided that repairs are carried out using exclusively the same type of drystone rubble walling that composed the existing wall and that they do not significantly modify the overall profile or character of the wall. Again, Mepa is responsible for the administration, implementation and enforcement of these regulations.
Now, somebody in the corridors of power in this EU member state must be responsible for such works, unless, of course, someone convinces me that there is only a virtual government. The minister responsible for the environment cannot be held directly responsible for the works done but is directly responsible to ensure that environmental policies, laws and regulations are adhered to. He has a very expensive watchdog to see to this but it seems this watchdog is all bark and no bite.
The minister has the authority to direct in no uncertain way that the duty to protect the environment is not just his but is a collective political responsibility. As chairman of the National Sustainable Development Commission he has all the tools to do so. Unfortunately, as I finalised this article, I read in The Times that “Just before Parliament rose for the summer recess, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi, who is responsible for environment matters, confirmed that the National Sustainable Development Commission was disbanded in 2008 after the government approved the sustainable development strategy”. And this despite national and EU obligations! Yet, we are also told that “the government puts responsibility for sustainable development at the ‘highest level’”.

When protected national heritage meets financial consideration and political decisions - despite the 'high level' or responsibility given to 'sustainable development'

What is the use of drafting regulations and national environment policies when some Cabinet colleagues and their staff are immune to the laws of the land? In the meantime, the watchdog, Mepa, like pale melancholy, sits retired, staring and ruminating its impotency to control the mauling of environmental and public assets.
I would not be surprised if I am taken to task by some colour-blinkered pen pusher on grounds that this is a trivial matter. Admittedly, I am not writing on the building of a new power station but the same concept, the same perception and the same vision (or lack of it) apply to both examples. First, go ahead with the development and, then, consider the regulations and see if there are any necessary permits to acquire. In the meantime, tell the gullible this is highest level of sustainable development at its best.

The long and winding road for protected trees in the Maltese Islands.

The Bisazza Street Syndrome (BSS) is rearing its ugly head – one legislates, another ignores. If BSS is not taken by the horns and immediately put in check, it will soon become the national environmental policy without any need for public consultations and without any need for backup legislation.
I can image that the picture of sustainable development to be submitted at the next UN Rio +20 conference in 2012 to mark the 20th anniversary of the Rio earth summit will be all nice and rosy: Malta puts responsibilty for sustianable development at the highest level while disbanding the commission to ensure that sustainable development is achieved.
Other photos taken on 24th Augut 2011, showing the complete desregard for protected trees, and protected rubble walls, despite the fresh declaration that “the government puts responsibility for sustainable development at the ‘highest level’”

According to Maltese politicians and their advisors, this is a tree - a protected tree!

Politically, to the applause of the gullible, it was the tree's fault moving in the bulldozer's path!

The dead branches of a mauled potected Aleppo Pine tree. Only possible with a permit from the Minster for the Environment and the Minster for Resources and Rural Affairs!

NO COMMENT - readers may wish to comment themselves.

One of the ARRIVA bus stops in the stretch of the new works. With the arrival of the new bus service, social, environmental and financial negative impacts have also arrived, though as I understand, some are still waiting for the buses.


An official water policy!

July 4, 2011

An official water policy!

Alfred E Baldacchino

On Friday, 1 st July, while driving from Rabat toward Valletta at 11.30am, I noticed that the turf at the  roundabout along the Rabat Road (intersecting with Zebbug/Mtarfa bypass) was being watered with sprinklers. Some of the

2011.07.01 - wasting water resources - 1

sprinklers were simply watering the adjacent road, to the extent that any driver who was so thirsty could simply put his head out of the car’s window and have a sip. Those who wanted to clean one side of the car could also go round twice or thrice and have their car’s right-hand side cleaned.  Naturally the  water spread on the road, cars splashing in it , eventually finding  its way along the Zebbug bypass. The couple of photos I took can give an idea of such a waste of resources, more acute if one adds the energy used to activate this.

Now this is not the first time I have seen this, and not only at this particular roundabout.   Many others have also commented in the media. In a  week in March, on a rainy day, yes in March, and I had the car wipers busy cleaning the rain water from my windscreen, the sprinklers at the Santa Lucia roundabout were busy watering the turf at that roundabout.  As usual a couple of these were sprinkling the road and not the turf, perhaps an ingenious computerised way of diverting water from the turf this  having been saturated with the sprinklers’ water and the rain water.  And this leads me to ask a  number of questions that I find great difficulty in answering:

2011.07.01 - wasting water resources - 2

  1. Hasn’t water been declared a rare resource in the Maltese Islands and great efforts are being made to properly manage, monitor and prevent waste?
  2. Hasn’t it been made ample clear that in our country with such high temperatures and such a lack of water supply, turf is not the best plant to use for landscaping, as has been pointed time and time again in the various Environment Impact Assessments where the use of turf was  suggested?
  3. Isn’t such “embellishment” (sic) projects – heavily paid by public funds to the tune of  a minimum 7 milliom Euros  (LM3 million of our old money) a year – not sustainable and a great misuse of resources ?
  4. Who is paying for such a waste of resources? Please do not tell me that the people are paying for such waste.  we all know it.
  5. Has the Ministry abdicated all responsibility and is giving  blank cheques as long as business is carried out, irrespective of  negative impacts on society and on the environment?
  6. Isn’t the Ministry responsible for monitoring, enforcing and planning such ‘landscaping’ the same Ministry who is responsible for National Resources, including water?  If it was two different Ministries, say one planning to make Bisazza Street a pedestrian zone, and the other planning new bus routes through it, then perhaps, perhaps, perhaps, each  could point a finger to each other.  But this is the same Ministry!!
  7. Does the Ministry have any qualified personnel in a responsible executive position to check such misuses and mismanagement of resources in such planning initiatives? Or does it have a rubber stamp to endorse all polices and expenses presented to it, as long as it is related to ‘business’?
  8. Is it the Government’s  policy  ” that where the economy stutters, the environment is the first to suffer”, a statement that we have also heard in connection with the Dwejra filming  amateurish handling?
  9. Doesn’t this country, one of the 27 EU member states, deserve much better than all this bullshit in the name of the national interest?

The Adam and Eve guilty feeling

Even the stone statue in the middle of the said roundabout were so denuded of reasons to justify what they were seeing, that they had a look of a guilty feeling.  They looked so ashamed and embarrassed at such greed  that they could not even look each other in the eye.  Reminded me of the guilty feeling Adam and Eve might have had after the biblical apple-affair!  So they preferred to look at the people as if to support them and pity them for the misuse and mismanagement  of their resources!  But I suppose those who are gifted with more wisdom that I  (politically that is)  will tell me that politicians are made of much more precious stuff than stone – they cannot possibly have such guilty feelings!

The closest answer I could possibly  find  to all  my questions is incorporated in an article by Martin Scicluna  in the Malta Independent on Sunday of the 3rd July 2011, as per attached link:

http://www.independent.com.mt/news.asp?newsitemid=128140

  1. 2011.07.01 - wasting water resources - 3

    2011.07.01 - wasting water resources - 4